The Instigator
Zealotical
Pro (for)
Losing
14 Points
The Contender
Clockwork
Con (against)
Winning
21 Points

Would you consider this a meal on wheels?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Clockwork
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/18/2009 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 881 times Debate No: 8345
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (5)

 

Zealotical

Pro

There is this guy in a wheelchair and this girl goes up to them and they start 69ing each other and also doing other things. Would you consider this a meal on wheels?

I would say yes because the guy would be filling the girl up if you know what I mean. ;)

I await for an opponent and also, this is a joke debate for those that don't know.
Clockwork

Con

No, I would not consider that to be a meal on wheels.

Because I do not consider the above mentioned situation to be a mean on wheels, the resolution has been effectively negated. Vote Con.

I thank you for your time.
Debate Round No. 1
Zealotical

Pro

Zealotical forfeited this round.
Clockwork

Con

*yawn*

A bit of a poor joke on my opponent's part, and at that he still has not proven that the aforementioned instance could logically be considered a meal, much less that I myself should do so regardless.

My opponent asked the contender whether or not he considered the situation above to be a meal on wheels; because I (the contender) do not, the resolution fails.

P.S. Spam debates aren't fun. Don't post them.
Debate Round No. 2
Zealotical

Pro

I thank my opponent for accepting this challenge

The reason why I would consider this a meal on weels is because the girl would be swallowing his sperm while she is 69ing him in the wheelcheer.

Unlike con, I gave a VALID reason why this would be consider a meal on wheels. Con did give a reaon, however he didn't give a GOOD, REAL, VALID reason why it wouldn't be considered a meal on wheels.

So vote PRO! Not for putting up the topic, but for putting up a better arguement.
Clockwork

Con

The resolution clearly poses a question: Would you consider this to be a meal on wheels?

Obviously, my opponent does not ask this of himself, otherwise it would contain an "I" instead of a "you." Therefore, I will acknowledge both of the possible directives of the word you as stated and will negate both connotations.

If the word "you" is a question asked to the contender (as per most forms of nonformal, conversational debate) then the assertion is easily negated by my statement that I do not believe the situation to be a meal on wheels.

However, the resolution still fails if we assume the question to be asked to those who will vote on this debate. In that case, the problem with the resolution lies with the word "meal". I briefly touched upon this on my round two but my opponent doesn't seem to have recognized his dropped burden of proof in relating the situation to a "meal"

"A meal is an instance of eating, specifically one that takes place at a specific time and includes specific, prepared food." (http://en.wikipedia.org...)

The situation which my opponent mentioned included food of no kind. Consumption does not substantiate a meal. My baby sister once swallowed a quarter, but under no circumstances would that be labeled by a doctor as a "meal", but rather choking. If I were to take my vitamins in the morning that would not constitute a meal because I am not consuming food.

Because sperm is obviously not food, it cannot be considered part of a meal. My opponent has failed to prove otherwise, and has never provided adequate reasoning to fulfill his burden of proving that the aforementioned situation is actually a meal. Vote con.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Ragnar_Rahl 7 years ago
Ragnar_Rahl
It's a snack, not a meal. A healthy snack maybe.
Posted by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
-1.

Eww.
Posted by pewpewpew 8 years ago
pewpewpew
Thats digusting...
Posted by NickyB 8 years ago
NickyB
I can't tell if this is a bad debate, or a bad joke... Someone help me understand.
Posted by DeadLeaves93 8 years ago
DeadLeaves93
My god...
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by TheCategorical 7 years ago
TheCategorical
ZealoticalClockworkTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by pewpewpew 7 years ago
pewpewpew
ZealoticalClockworkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Ruperttheg 8 years ago
Ruperttheg
ZealoticalClockworkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Clockwork 8 years ago
Clockwork
ZealoticalClockworkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Zealotical 8 years ago
Zealotical
ZealoticalClockworkTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70