Would you do the wrong thing but for the right reasons
Debate Rounds (3)
Their is always a better way to go about something, it may be the harder way, but it is the right way.
~Right is right, and wrong is wrong, and when people start getting it confused, that means they need to sit down with some real people.
~It is the greatest good to the greatest number of people which is the measure of right and wrong.
I thank my opponet for giving me the chance to debate such a interesting topic.
Many have tried, their is no conclusion, no light at the end of the tunnel.
You may make a paradise, but you would kill millions in the act of it.
And you say it like when you do, everyone will just stop sinning and become angels, you are wrong. People will not stop, they will always want, they will desire what they dont have, and eventually, they will do anything for it.
IF i did steal, without an doubt i would be put in jail. Wrong is wrong, no matter how you put it.
I really have no more to say.After all, you would have to be out of your right mind to think otherwise.
Thanks for letting me have this great debate with you.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Chaosism 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro presented arguments, which were not properly understood or refuted by Con. To elaborate, Pro described two hypothetical situations to demonstrate his point: killing to prevent WW3 and stealing food for your starving family. Regarding the first, Con argued against the validity of the situation (perfect world) and did not address the point that Pro was trying to make, and did not argue that it would be wrong to take such action. Regarding the second, Con ignored the component, "Your only option would be to...", as he interjected another option. Again, he did not explain why stealing would be wrong; he just claimed it. Arguments to Pro. Everything else was even.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.