The Instigator
TheDebateMaster1
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
lannan13
Con (against)
Winning
56 Points

Write as many political parties as you can (Quick Debate)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
lannan13
Voting Style: Open Point System: Select Winner
Started: 8/6/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,264 times Debate No: 60053
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (22)
Votes (8)

 

TheDebateMaster1

Pro

Each player got 5 minutes to write as many political parties as they can, without doing copy and paste. Then the voters have 3 days to vote on who wrote the most parties, with correct spelling and grammar

1. Round: Acceptance
2. Round: Write as many political parties as you can

Rule 1. Do not Copy&Paste
Rule 2. Don't cheat
Rule 3. Don't Use semantics
Rule 4.Only write 'I accept' for the 1st round
Rule 5. Don't use Grammar or spellcheck to check your argument for mistakes
Rule 6: US Political parties allowed only
Rule 7. Follow the rules

Definitons:

Political party:
Group of persons organized to acquire and exercise political power. Formal political parties originated in their modern form in Europe and the U.S. in the 19th century. Whereas mass-based parties appeal for support to the whole electorate, cadre parties aim at attracting only an active elite; most parties have features of both types. All parties develop a political program that defines their ideology and sets out the agenda they would pursue should they win elective office or gain power through extraparliamentary means. Most countries have single-party, two-party, or multiparty systems (see party system). In the U.S., party candidates are usually selected through primary elections at the state level. [1]

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

lannan13

Con

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
TheDebateMaster1

Pro

Liberal Party
Green Pary
Conservative party
Republic Party
Democratic Party
GreenRoots Party
Nazi Party
Communist Party
Socialist Party
Fascist Party
Greenpeace Party

lannan13

Con

Republican Party
Modern Whig Party
Libertarian Party
Green Party
Socialist Party
Justice Party
Constitution Party
America Party
America's First Party
American NAZI Party
American Independent Party
Communist Party USA
Freedom Socialist Party
Democrat Party
Nationial Socialist Movement
Reform Party
Prohibition Party
Socialist Party USA
Socialist Equality Party
Socialist Labor Party
Tax Wall Street Party
Worker's World Party
Centralist Party
Conservative Party USA
Working Families Party USA
US Pacifist Party
Vetrens Party of America
Debate Round No. 2
22 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by bladerunner060 2 years ago
bladerunner060
It would be nigh-impossible to prove he typed vs. copy/pasting.

The debate did not require that he type them from *memory*, so he could have even looked at a list and retyped. I see no grounds to assert he cheated.
Posted by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
Actually there is several on that list I do not have and I even have a few that are not on that list. The evidence is invalid.
Posted by TheDebateMaster1 2 years ago
TheDebateMaster1
All people who read this, comment on wheter lannan13 is innocent or guilty based on the youtube article. So we can solve this mystery, once and for all.
Posted by TheDebateMaster1 2 years ago
TheDebateMaster1
Suspicion (Possible Evidence): https://answers.yahoo.com...

Simmilarities

However, He could just have good memory skills, so he's innocent, untill proven guilty
Posted by TheDebateMaster1 2 years ago
TheDebateMaster1
Lannan13 is innocent unless proven guilty, with conclusive evidence, until then he is innocent
Posted by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
Aerogant is only spewing hatred towards me, because I voted against him in a few debates and have defeated him in a debate. There is no evidense as it is only a coincidense.
Posted by TheDebateMaster1 2 years ago
TheDebateMaster1
If there is conclusive evidence that what Aerogant said is true, then con is disqualified, and all con's points go to pro
Posted by Aerogant 2 years ago
Aerogant
There's a suspicious ABC order of lannan's list, in that most of it is in fact alphabetical - he just switched up parts to hide it. Pro won; Con cheated.
Posted by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
I know.
Posted by TheDebateMaster1 2 years ago
TheDebateMaster1
lucky for you
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by Vexorator 2 years ago
Vexorator
TheDebateMaster1lannan13
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: Con had more.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 2 years ago
bladerunner060
TheDebateMaster1lannan13
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: Fairly obvious, I think--Con's list was longer, he was able to write more political parties.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
TheDebateMaster1lannan13
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: more
Vote Placed by Siege 2 years ago
Siege
TheDebateMaster1lannan13
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: More parties.
Vote Placed by YaHey 2 years ago
YaHey
TheDebateMaster1lannan13
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: Con had more political parties listed and I see no conclusive evidence Con cheated.
Vote Placed by patrick967 2 years ago
patrick967
TheDebateMaster1lannan13
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: More parties were stated.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
TheDebateMaster1lannan13
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: more parties
Vote Placed by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
TheDebateMaster1lannan13
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: more parties