The Instigator
lilcheerleader2001
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points
The Contender
IATDM
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Year Round School

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
lilcheerleader2001
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/6/2013 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,089 times Debate No: 31002
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

lilcheerleader2001

Pro

I think there should be year round school because school is a great thing for kids. Kids still have breaks, but they just aren't as long. They have 4 breaks, 2 weeks long for each of them, Spring, summer, fall, and winter.
IATDM

Con

I think people should not have to go to school all year around because every once and a wile people need breaks
Debate Round No. 1
lilcheerleader2001

Pro

I see your point but if you were to acctuallly to read my last statement you would have seen that they do get breaks.
IATDM

Con

Im sorry I ment 99 day breaks+teachers need time to relax to
Debate Round No. 2
lilcheerleader2001

Pro

Teachers do have breaks, they have the weekend breaks and two week breaks each season. It is just a total fact.
IATDM

Con

teachers need time to prepare for the next school year and students need to sigh up and maybe they dont have time to do that
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by likespeace 3 years ago
likespeace
lilcheerleader2001IATDMTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con did not seem to read Pro's arguments. "They need breaks" was already addressed in Pro's opening statement. "Students need to sigh up and maybe they dont have time to do that" - This also made little sense to me. It's typically the parents who sign kids up for school, not the children. Neither side really supported their arguments, but Pro did a better job stating them.
Vote Placed by ConservativeAmerican 3 years ago
ConservativeAmerican
lilcheerleader2001IATDMTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct was tied, Pro, while his grammar was sketchy was better than Con's. Pro justified his argument a little, but still did a bad job. Con just voiced his opinions with proper justification. Neither side used sources