The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
5 Points

You are not my God

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/22/2009 Category: Religion
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,514 times Debate No: 9301
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (13)
Votes (1)




As Con I'll prove I am ReganFan's God.

Reason 1: Because no one understands "d(o__O)b" I'll translate what he means.
It means, "I forfeit and you're my God."

And because I haven't lost a single debate I am his God.
Reason 2: I'm the guy who looks for sin. In this case the "you are not my God" are should be singular thus it's "is." I caught that sin.

are not-are not

Con: you may be Reganfan's idol if you won any of his debates.
Debate Round No. 1


My god is a mud puddle, seeing as you are tying where as a mud puddle cannot, you can not possibly be my God.

My God - a mud puddle


I will like to redefine the resolution.

Clarification: both sides are saying you're not my God. Meaning Pro isn't Con's god, vise versa.

I will prove ReganFan isn't my God. I don't believe in a god, yet,therefore ReganFan cannot be my god. If ReganFan was a god he would be flawless, yet his record 2 wins -12 losses ...,therefore ReganFan isn't my god and cannot be a god.

Now for his point:
"you are "tying" as a mud puddle cannot"- What?
His god is a mud puddle yet his profile says Christian. God cannot be a mud puddle, he is a living spirit. If he continues to say his God is a mud puddle then he 1. Is a Christian hypocrite; 2. insanely worships mud puddles.
Mud puddles is not an established religion thus it's invalid.

He has also dropped all my points I made thus count those for voting points. He cannot bring it back up, silence is consent.

Therefore for reasoned above the resolution stays negated. Vote Con. Thanks
Debate Round No. 2


Clarification: one side (me) is trying to prove that the other side (con) is not their god while con is trying to prove they are, I worship a mud puddle their for con cannot be my God.

You didn't make any points because you didn't state why your my God.


I am ReganFan's god because I am a mud puddle, he worships it no doubt. Mud puddles can type. Take an example: Sand can move and thus type because they can form to become Sandman, which is the sand dude/person from Spiderman 3, similarly mud puddles make me into a humanoid and as a humanoid I can type because I have fingers. And I am typing on a waterproof keyboard:) Therefore I am a mud puddle and I am ReganFan's god. The resolution remains negated.
And he also dropped my point about translating "d(o__O)b" twice and cannot bring it back up. Thus I am his god. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3


d(o__O)b translates to be a guy with both his thumbs up, i couldn't type nothing, i figure it would be best for my opponent to argue first.


d(o__o)b signifies I won because my opponent didn't refute any points I made. He has propose that I am his God by drawing my attention to this debate (d(o__O)b is our code) thus I win this debate. If anyone else could have taken it then I am not his God, yet I accepted it because no one else did. I also said he couldn't bring this issue back up.

He has dropped my points about me being a mud puddle that can type. He has also dropped my grammar corrections that I caught as a sin.
In debate silent is consent, thus because ReganFan didn't refute any of Con's points he has agreed I am his God. I win.

For reasons above I have proven to be ReganFan's God so vote con. Thank you for such an entertaining debate, I'll be sure to grant you immortality when we meet again.
Debate Round No. 4
13 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Logical-Master 7 years ago
*sigh* Debates like this are part of why more users don't come here.
Posted by MTGandP 7 years ago
Conduct: Con - This was a stupid debate.
S&G: Con - That weird symbol is weird.
Arguments: Con - Pro got pwned. Brilliant semantics argument.
Sources: Tie
Posted by Nu-cleur021 7 years ago
he also dropped some points I made.
Posted by mongoose 7 years ago
He was talking about "I'm the guy who looks for sin. In this case the "you are not my God" are should be singular thus it's "is." I caught that sin."

It's supposed to be are, while CON said it should be is.
Posted by Alex 7 years ago
Wow mongeese, looks like your the epic fail.
Posted by ReganFan 7 years ago
actually im a fan of Donald Regan the 66th secretary of the treasury, its easy to see how a misguided liberal like mongeese would confuse Donald Regan with Ronald Reagan
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
Mislabeled grammar fail.
Posted by I-am-a-panda 7 years ago
ReaganFan was probably taken.
Posted by JBlake 7 years ago
You must not be that huge of a Ronald Reagan fan, seeing as though you misspelled his name in your username. Unless you meant Reagan's Treasury Secretary/Chief of Staff, Donald Regan?
Posted by Cerebral_Narcissist 7 years ago
I can't help but think that 'd(o__O)b' is a suitable opening argument.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by MTGandP 7 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05