The Instigator
kbreezy
Pro (for)
kbreezy
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Ds201049
Con (against)
Ds201049
Tied
0 Points

You do not need to be a Theist to have an objective standard of morality.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Started: 2/18/2011 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 293 times Debate No: 14842
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)

 

kbreezy

Pro

Definitions:

1. Moral - Expressing or conveying truths or counsel as to right conduct.

2. Atheist - One who does not believe in a deity.

3. Theist - One who does believe in a deity.

4. Objective - True/correct regardless of context.

I wish my opponent good luck. I will give him the opportunity to argue first.
Report this Argument
Ds201049

Con

I agree with you brother
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 1
kbreezy

Pro

kbreezy forfeited this round.
Ds201049

Con

Mr. Schoof I expect an explanation for this?
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 2
kbreezy

Pro

kbreezy forfeited this round.
Ds201049

Con

Ok Mr. schoof, I am assuming you forfeit the debate and therefore I win.
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 3
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by annhasle 2 years ago
annhasle
Are you fvcking serious?

@ Pro -- this was such an easy win! He did not uphold his stance as CON!!

@ Con -- why the F did you take it if you AGREED?!

Wow... *mind blown by the utter stupidity*
Report this Comment
No votes have been placed for this debate.