The Instigator
kbreezy
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Ds201049
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

You do not need to be a Theist to have an objective standard of morality.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/18/2011 Category: Religion
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 664 times Debate No: 14842
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

kbreezy

Pro

Definitions:

1. Moral - Expressing or conveying truths or counsel as to right conduct.

2. Atheist - One who does not believe in a deity.

3. Theist - One who does believe in a deity.

4. Objective - True/correct regardless of context.

I wish my opponent good luck. I will give him the opportunity to argue first.
Ds201049

Con

I agree with you brother
Debate Round No. 1
kbreezy

Pro

kbreezy forfeited this round.
Ds201049

Con

Mr. Schoof I expect an explanation for this?
Debate Round No. 2
kbreezy

Pro

kbreezy forfeited this round.
Ds201049

Con

Ok Mr. schoof, I am assuming you forfeit the debate and therefore I win.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by annhasle 6 years ago
annhasle
Are you fvcking serious?

@ Pro -- this was such an easy win! He did not uphold his stance as CON!!

@ Con -- why the F did you take it if you AGREED?!

Wow... *mind blown by the utter stupidity*
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
kbreezyDs201049Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
kbreezyDs201049Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF