The Instigator
KingDebater
Pro (for)
Winning
11 Points
The Contender
Laserpak
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

You just trumped.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
KingDebater
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/24/2013 Category: Health
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,096 times Debate No: 30632
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

KingDebater

Pro

Ewww did you just trump?

Definitions:
Trump - To fart
Fart - To expel intestinal gas through the anus; break wind. [1]

Sources:
[1] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...
Laserpak

Con

In fact, no. I did not.
Debate Round No. 1
KingDebater

Pro


Arguments
Whoever denied it(1) supplied it(1). [1]

Rebuttals
Con's Claim: In fact, no. I did not.
This is a baseless assertion. If Con wants to win this debate, he'd better have arguments that are better than this.

Sources
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...

Notes
(1) - Referring to the causation of the fart.

Laserpak

Con

Whoever smelled it dealt it.*

Pro's Claim: Whoever denied it supplied it.
This claim was not aimed at any person or persons. If Pro wants to win, he'd better be a lot more specific.

*NOTE: It, reffering to the releasing of gas, is aimed precisely at Con, who seems to have a very smelly room at the moment.
Debate Round No. 2
KingDebater

Pro

Rebuttals
#1
My Claim:
Whoever denied it supplied it.
Con's Claim: This claim was not aimed at any person or persons. If Pro wants to win, he'd better be a lot more specific.
To clarify, Con was denying the fact that he was the efficient cause of intestinal gas.

#2
Con's Claim: Whoever smelled it dealt it.*
*NOTE: It, reffering to the releasing of gas, is aimed precisely at Con, who seems to have a very smelly room at the moment.
Con has made two baseless assertions. The first one being that I smelt the trump, the second being that I have a very smelly room.

Arguments
Whoever did the rhyme (1) did the crime (2). [1]

Conclusion

- Con has left my arguments unrefuted, and thus has failed to meet his burden of proof, whilst I have produced some very conclusive arguments that remain unscathed.
- Con has trumped. My arguments show this.

Notes
(1) The word 'rhyme' refers to Con's statement that reads 'Whoever smelled it dealt it'.
(2) The word 'crime' refers to the causation of the release of the intestinal gas.

Sources
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...
Laserpak

Con

For all of you readers who are wondering why the freak this debate was even started, I am wondering the same thing... I only joined this so I could finally vote. The reason you should vote for me is because I am not some superficial tool that created a stupid debate for some reason. It seems pretty obvious to me...

Plus, just between you and me, I didn't actually trump.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Laserpak 3 years ago
Laserpak
Please, before anyone votes, realize that Pro was using wikipedia... My definition of a semi-reliable source... Plus, why would anyone even vote for Pro? He obviously was just bored out of his mind, so he just created a worthless debate so he could feel good about himself...

If I could vote, I would... But seeing as I am fairly new to this, please, someone vote for Con for me, please?
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by sbaik610 3 years ago
sbaik610
KingDebaterLaserpakTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Why did you trump?
Vote Placed by lit.wakefield 4 years ago
lit.wakefield
KingDebaterLaserpakTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:20 
Reasons for voting decision: Sources to Pro for his use of sources.
Vote Placed by Smithereens 4 years ago
Smithereens
KingDebaterLaserpakTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro used wikipedia twice and freedictionaryonline once for sources, so I'll give him the most reliable sources points and since he actually put effort into doing this debate, despite the fallacies, he gets the convincing argument point too.
Vote Placed by AlwaysMoreThanYou 4 years ago
AlwaysMoreThanYou
KingDebaterLaserpakTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was more amusing, so I'll give him S/G.