The Instigator
BobTheLibertarian
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
MASTERY
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

You pick the debate, anything I don't care what it is.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
MASTERY
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/18/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 367 times Debate No: 49340
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

BobTheLibertarian

Pro

1st argument is acceptance and picking the debate. 2nd is opening statements 3rd is rebuttals and closing statements.
MASTERY

Con

I will pick the debate topic and I'm con. The debate topic is coins should be made out of sterling gold. I define coins as "a flat, typically round piece of metal with an official stamp, used as money". I define sterling gold as "a yellow precious metal, the chemical element of atomic number 79, valued esp. for use in jewelry and decoration, and to guarantee the value of currencies". I define made out of as composing of 95% or more.

Thank you.

Debate Round No. 1
BobTheLibertarian

Pro

BobTheLibertarian forfeited this round.
MASTERY

Con

My opponent has forfeited the previous round.
Debate Round No. 2
BobTheLibertarian

Pro

BobTheLibertarian forfeited this round.
MASTERY

Con

MASTERY forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
BobTheLibertarianMASTERYTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: ff, 1st round pro made run-on sentence error
Vote Placed by The_Scapegoat_bleats 3 years ago
The_Scapegoat_bleats
BobTheLibertarianMASTERYTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Both participants forfeited, but Con did so after pointing out that Pro did. I consider it bad conduct to criticise someone for something and then doing the same thing.