The Instigator
Crazyunicronx
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
Cade2000
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

YouTube should be banned!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Crazyunicronx
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/20/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,067 times Debate No: 68611
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (1)

 

Crazyunicronx

Con

I think that YouTube should not be banned! YouTube is part of everyday life now, and many children in school are getting taught through YouTube.
Cade2000

Pro

Youtube should absolutely not be banned.
You've said that it is integrating itself into our daily life and it's educating our youth.
Where is the downside?
Youtube is globalizing education and entertainment. It's a great way to spread knowledge and will
probably lead education in 3rd world countries through the Google Loon. (http://www.google.com...)

As far as I can see Youtube has only positive effects and will be incredibly beneficial to 3rd world countries.
Debate Round No. 1
Crazyunicronx

Con

As my opponent misread what was written and forgot that he was the proposition I guess I win by forfeit! Hopefully I could have another match with Cade, he does seem like a skilled debater, if only he didn't misread the argument.
Cade2000

Pro

Thanks man, pm me or something when you think of a good argument. :3
Debate Round No. 2
Crazyunicronx

Con

Crazyunicronx forfeited this round.
Cade2000

Pro

Cade2000 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Crazyunicronx 2 years ago
Crazyunicronx
Thank You! UndeniableReality
Posted by UndeniableReality 2 years ago
UndeniableReality
I see what CocoCoo is saying, but to be fair, the opening round makes Con's position clear.
Posted by Crazyunicronx 2 years ago
Crazyunicronx
I only done it like this because I've got a debate at school with te same motion and I was against it, that's why I wanted to see what other people would say...
Posted by CooCooClockofDoom 2 years ago
CooCooClockofDoom
If you are going to post a topic like "Youtube should be banned!" then it would seem you feel very for this idea. It would be like going out in public and shouting "Obama is bad!" and then someone will walk up to you and say "I'm going to try and convince you Obama is not bad" and then they explain a very detailed argument and after they are done you just go "Oh, I never thought Obama was bad, I was just trying to get someone else who thinks Obama is bad to come up to me and say, 'I know man, that Obama guy really is bad' so I could could say that Obama is really good and then confuse the man I am talking to." In conclusion, if you put up a topic with a title like this, you should probably be pro for it.
Posted by Hud4 2 years ago
Hud4
Are you on drugs
Posted by limitedaura 2 years ago
limitedaura
Youtube should not be banned, I don't see how its a wrong thing, many people learn lots off youtube and its a way to connect to each other, just shows you how big the world is
Posted by Cade2000 2 years ago
Cade2000
I um... didn't see the not. e.e This was a sad defeat.
Posted by UndeniableReality 2 years ago
UndeniableReality
Cade, You should have read the proposition and the first post more carefully.
Posted by Cade2000 2 years ago
Cade2000
I beg to differ.
Posted by Crazyunicronx 2 years ago
Crazyunicronx
Yeah I know, but it's worth a try...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
CrazyunicronxCade2000Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Both sides argued for Con, so Con wins.