The Instigator
racsomv
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

YouTube should be considered an eligible source of credible information

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA
Voting Style: Open Point System: Select Winner
Started: 4/10/2015 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 440 times Debate No: 73258
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

racsomv

Pro

First round is acceptance, because mostly everyone else does it.
8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA

Con

I accept this.
Debate Round No. 1
racsomv

Pro

racsomv forfeited this round.
8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA

Con

Pro has full burden of proof.
Debate Round No. 2
racsomv

Pro

racsomv forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
worship your tube
Posted by AlternativeDavid 2 years ago
AlternativeDavid
Remember, when you make the first round acceptance on a three round debate, it becomes a two round debate. That's almost never long enough to make coherent arguments and rebuttals.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by emporer1 2 years ago
emporer1
racsomv8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: Anyone can post on youtube. Someone could post a video and say that people have 200 eyes but would that actually be credible information.
Vote Placed by Chaosism 2 years ago
Chaosism
racsomv8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: Full forfeit by Pro.