Hi it is quiet obvious that old people have a lot of experience and it is very much believed that everything is learnt with experience and hence the nation is led by the old lot of the nation which i strongly oppose because old people are very much their to support the nation and it is acceptable but when it comes to making decision the decision making ability holds good in the youth because anything and everything which is an hindrance to the growth of the nation is very much noticed by the youth as they go out on a daily basis and they very well know what happens in our day to day lives whereas old people sit back home doing nothing which would hardly give them any knowledge Mr X who is old and a politician sits back home in front of a tv waiting for assistant to come and give news about the state on a daily basis who does nothing apart from coming out during elections would know more about the state or Mr y who goes out everyday and looks at the daily life who knows what we are lacking in what we are good at and everything and yes this is an easy way to measure the requirement of the nations strength and weakness which will ideally lead to improvement in those particular sectors
I don't think it should be a matter of age. A good leader is a good leader, but on balance people no longer in their youth (let's say people 28+) have more life experience and therefore have a better idea of how to run the nation. Sure, it's pretty much a craps shoot no matter what you do, but let's at least stack the odds in our favor and hand the reigns over to those who have most likely been through these things before.
There's not much else I can say this round because you haven't really laid out a hard argument here... or use any punctuation whatsoever (which is actually pretty impressive), so I'll pass the ball off to you for now.