You've excluded we, you smartypants.
Debate Rounds (3)
Thank you for allowing me to debate with you.
Now the resolution of this debate is :You've excluded we, you smartypants.
Getting rid of the smarty pants, you can see that the resolution states: You've excluded we.
Now, since the pro side failed to provide any definitions, I would like to provide definitions of my own.
You:used to refer to the person or people that the speaker is addressing.
Have:possess, own, or hold.
Excluded:deny (someone) access to or bar (someone) from a place, group, or privilege.
We:used by a speaker to refer to himself or herself and one or more other people considered together.
"Smartypants":a person who talks and behaves like someone who knows everything.
Now based off of my definitions, the resolution now reads :" You, as in the person I am addressing, possesses access to bar someone from a place, group, or privilege, because I am a person who talks like I know everything."
Now, I negate this for the following reason.
1.Statistically Speaking, not all of us can be "smartypants"
There are those who cannot form coherent words and/or those who are too young to take in intelligence.
"About 15 percent of the world's population -- some 785 million people -- has a significant physical or mental disability, including about 5 percent of children, according to a new report prepared jointly by the World Health Organization and the World Bank. "
Saying that we are all mentally smart is incorrect.
The pro side does not elaborate on what he means by balance is coming, so you should vote con.
Thank you for debating with me,
As the pro side has said, he needs to retort my first contention. However, the pro side has not said anything to rebut my case, so please extend my contention.
I will continue to prove to you that the pro side is incorrect.
For all of the reasons above, please vote con.
Pro side, has said " Vote Con."
So, Please vote Con.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ThinkBig 4 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro told me to vote con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.