The Instigator
dianaXoX1
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
leandro.sanchez
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points

Zoo's should not exist

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
leandro.sanchez
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/20/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,092 times Debate No: 36855
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

dianaXoX1

Con

Zoo's should not exist because would you like to be taken from your home and be caged for the rest of your life...NO... animals don't survive that long in the zoo then they do in the wild . They are not meant for entertainment they living creatures that should live in the home called the wild not in a cage with nothing to do .
leandro.sanchez

Pro

You are new her right begginer error i supose?
you are right thanks for making my job easy arguing with me.
i will use your argument as my argument:
Zoo's should not exist because would you like to be taken from your home and be caged for the rest of your life...NO... animals don't survive that long in the zoo then they do in the wild . They are not meant for entertainment they living creatures that should live in the home called the wild not in a cage with nothing to do .
Debate Round No. 1
dianaXoX1

Con

dianaXoX1 forfeited this round.
leandro.sanchez

Pro

well with such a start no wonder
Debate Round No. 2
dianaXoX1

Con

dianaXoX1 forfeited this round.
leandro.sanchez

Pro

leandro.sanchez forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
dianaXoX1

Con

dianaXoX1 forfeited this round.
leandro.sanchez

Pro

i will keep forfeiting base your votes on our previus arguments if there arent any new ones.
Debate Round No. 4
dianaXoX1

Con

dianaXoX1 forfeited this round.
leandro.sanchez

Pro

no further to add i shall use my opponent argument as my own
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by leandro.sanchez 3 years ago
leandro.sanchez
you should give this debatte up.just wright i give up.
exept you changed you opinion on zoos
Posted by leandro.sanchez 3 years ago
leandro.sanchez
you premis is:Zoo's should not exist
con is supposed to say zoo should exist.con is against the premis
pro:is supposed to say Zoo's should not exist.
pro supports the premis
con denies it
my english is not good but i hope you understant
Posted by QandA 3 years ago
QandA
Shouldn't you be pro then?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by sweetbreeze 3 years ago
sweetbreeze
dianaXoX1leandro.sanchezTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited, convincing arguments to Pro because Con debated on the wrong side. If she's Con, she should argue to why zoos SHOULD exist. S/G goes to nobody, because in the title, it should be "Zoos", not "Zoo's", and Pro did not capitalize most of the time.