abortion should be legal up to the first trimester
Debate Rounds (4)
I want a opinion based debate but if you do need to use sources for FACTS then I'd rather not have to read through a ton of sites so please try to keep sources to a minimum and they must be reliable as in not .com or wikkapidia.
My argument is abortion should be legal up to 3 months.
If you disagree post why and I'll tell you why I disagree with your opinion and vise versa.
Comment if I forget to address one of your point
young teenage girls with a bad home lives
young teenage girls that could be killed of injured
mothered or fathered by someone with aids or other illnesses
Abortion has to be an option. It is irresponsible to ignore any of the above reasons.
This is not an argument, it is not even properly written. Pro has not only given no reason to agree with him, but he has also treated this serious topic with a lack of respect.
My opponent has not made an argument. He has listed words. I am not arguing against anything. He doesn't get to simply spam random words and then expect my to piece together his argument like a jigsaw.
The proposition. "abortion should be legal up to the first trimester"
His argument is just singular words with no context. Midgets? What? What about rape? Is rape a reason for abortion legalisation? Why? Why the first trimester? No argument. I have written more than he has about this on this debate.
Tay-sachs is a prebirth testable disease that is when the child is incapable of breaking down fats in his/her brain causing death before the child is 5 and retardation earlier than3.
If abortion was illegal than that parent would have to to watch her baby die over the coarse of 5 years instead of just quick, painless
My opponent forgets about post-birth lack of treatment for cases as tay-sachs. My opponent has not given solid foundations for his arguments, so quickly, I will write this.
In his given cases, he gives fringe examples, but doesn't give any reason to justify complete legalisation or why 3 months, over say 4 months. I can say for all his cases 'Let's allow an 'emergency' abortion', but that still doesn't meet the criterion for his B.O.P, that is 'all abortion'. He failed to meet his B.O.P.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Cold-Mind 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||1|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro should have made arguments in form of statements. I know what he meant by those words he listed, but listing words in not enough. Con is not mandatory to decifer what Pro meant.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.