The Instigator
fa
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Emilrose
Con (against)
Winning
32 Points

about coeducation

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Emilrose
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/26/2014 Category: Education
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 813 times Debate No: 67554
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (5)

 

fa

Pro

im in the favour of co education because in co education students are confident they dont shy with opposite sex because who people study in same sex school oor colledge they have diffelculties in in their next levelin job etc
Emilrose

Con

Case Against Co-Education

Pro claims that: "in co education students are confident they dont shy with opposite sex because who people study in same sex school oor colledge they have diffelculties in in their next levelin job etc."

Regardless of co-education or not, interaction among the genders is an inevitable part of life. This means that even if one does not attend a co-educational school, they will intermingle with both males and females outside a school setting. For example, one can learn how to be confident with the opposite sex through extra curricular activities and other forms of social interaction after school. If that individual is brought up in a household with members of the opposite sex, which is likely, they can also learn how to develop communication with them in that environment.

Pro has presented no evidence to suggest that same-sex encourages shyness and that it leads to difficulties in the future careers of pupils. In fact, examples would show that many people who attend same-sex schools receive a higher quality of education, later attend universities and secure considerably lucrative jobs.

[1.] http://www.singlesexschools.org...

[2.] http://www.ascd.org...
Debate Round No. 1
fa

Pro

fa forfeited this round.
Emilrose

Con

Forfeit by Pro, so no additional arguments to rebut.
Debate Round No. 2
fa

Pro

fa forfeited this round.
Emilrose

Con

Anther forfeit.

Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Asburnu 2 years ago
Asburnu
Whether it is co-education or not, I encourage everyone to at least be educated enough in their own language to avoid glaring errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar. Auto correct features have done great damage to our written language, to the extent that those who spend little time reading and writing outside social media and texting, are very easy to spot.
Posted by TheSpoonyRealist 2 years ago
TheSpoonyRealist
I want to take it... but would it be considered noob sniping?
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by darthebearnc 2 years ago
darthebearnc
faEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Pro forfeits and Con does not. Spelling - Pro misspells multiple times and Con does not. Arguments - Con provides a coherent, evidence-backed argument and Pro does not. Sources - Con provides sources and Pro does not.
Vote Placed by Mr.Chorlton 2 years ago
Mr.Chorlton
faEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeiture. All points to con.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
faEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: oh yay, Mrs. Emily Unbeaten gets another free victory! Seriously, noobs have got to stop ff'ing debates on DDO.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
faEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con provided an unanswered counter-argument. Conduct to Con for Pro's forfeit. Sources to Con for being to only person to provide any. S&G to Con because Pro's only *sentence* was a grammatical nightmare.
Vote Placed by o0jeannie0o 2 years ago
o0jeannie0o
faEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeit and no arguement