acting is the problem of the existence of religion
Debate Rounds (5)
to be, or to not act, that is the answer
theists and atheists have no free will, they have no ability to think
only the agnostic sees they are both wrong, while they are unable to
belief is immoral
morality is knowledge, opposite
I find it odd that you preach against religion and the like, when you seem to worship knowledge as divine. I also don't understand how you can consider Satan wrong and yet have one of the most occult symbols as your profile picture. I think you are a Gnostic, not an agnostic. If I am being presumptuous, tell me, but how can you have a "religion" and preach against religion?
unbeliever based on belief to the contrary is atheism, is thesim
knowledge is not true, morality is logical, is knowledge, truth
you dont make your choices, you follow a book
i dont have religion, the all seeing eye pyramid capstone reflection flying at the top of a pyramid represents me
i know god is false, my position is different
Question: is this a serious debate? Anyway, what would you lose by believing in God? We do not follow a book, we follow the book. You are using flawed logic. Besides, I think Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle proved that logic isn't always absolute.
logic has no flaws
no causeless effects exist, reality is flawless
no it was based on his reasoning
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.