The Instigator
Ji-won
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points
The Contender
TetsuRiken
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points

addictions to game

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Ji-won
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/24/2013 Category: Games
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 824 times Debate No: 41145
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (13)
Votes (3)

 

Ji-won

Pro

The first appearance of the game from 20 years ago, the addiction of game has always been mentioned. Depending on development of computer and smart phone, people can play the game anytime, anywhere. It was enough addictive.
At first, game play alone. For instance video game which doesn't connect each other through internet. Most people don't predict that game will become not only large industry but also addiction of game.
Depending on development of electronic devices, The game was launched in many diverse fields. And almost game connect through internet. many people start to addict game.
Now our society, this problem is not only game addiction but also additional crime. The first person shooting game must kills people. And then they are winner. Young people play the first person shooting game, they cognize contempt of life.
People must solve these problem. To solve this problem, there are two ways to do this. First, playing a game time is limited by age groups. Second, school educate correct lecture about game.
Although, the game industry is huge value, The game industry has achieved rapid development. As to the development of the game industry is experiencing side effects.

First solution, playing a game time is limited by age groups. It is positive working which have not yet mature children restraint self-control, excessive use of the game can be prevented and because of divided by age group, People can understand this policy.

Second solution, school educate correct lecture about game. It is working which Excluding a game, stress solution method tells people and people can know how to properly utilize game.

The game has become an essential presence in our society. Excessive game addiction, our society is so sick. people must know how to properly utilize
TetsuRiken

Con

Dude just because you limit games to age and try to lecture children about games doesn't mean that a child of a teenager like myself won't still get addicted game they will just get addicted to games that aren't CoD or GTA.
Debate Round No. 1
Ji-won

Pro

Ji-won forfeited this round.
TetsuRiken

Con

So no round 2 try again for 3.
Debate Round No. 2
Ji-won

Pro

Ji-won forfeited this round.
TetsuRiken

Con

Do I win with the shortest augment that I've ever done?
Debate Round No. 3
13 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
Umm people are just saying crime is caused by games but if the person ho plays a game cause homicide its not the game its them
Posted by AlexThunder 3 years ago
AlexThunder
Let me just say that there are age restrictions on games, currently. People still play it. My younger brother has been playing Call of Duty, an 18+ first person shooter game and yet he has still to go crazy and start gunning people down.

And again there are lectures done in schools about video games, but they are all agenda-driven.
Posted by walkertreat 3 years ago
walkertreat
If somebody kills another just because they play video games, its obvioudms they were messed up before getting into games
Posted by TetsuRiken 3 years ago
TetsuRiken
I read debate that have been over before they began.
Posted by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
I said when it ends
Posted by TetsuRiken 3 years ago
TetsuRiken
Its possible trust me.
Posted by OtakuJordan 3 years ago
OtakuJordan
You said that you will be voting for con even though the debate is not over yet. How can you have read the arguments if they haven't even all been posted yet? Lol.
Posted by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
I read the debate
Posted by OtakuJordan 3 years ago
OtakuJordan
Good to know that you pick which side to vote for before you've even read the arguments, Gohan.
Posted by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
People just blame video games but have no valueable resources when this debate ends I will have to vote or con
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by OtakuJordan 3 years ago
OtakuJordan
Ji-wonTetsuRikenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Only Pro had arguments.
Vote Placed by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
Ji-wonTetsuRikenTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Well both gave little argument but pro FF and con stated no arguments but he was the only one who was still at the debate. And spelling goes to pro because con spelled argument wrongly
Vote Placed by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
Ji-wonTetsuRikenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Clearly. Con had no arguments.