The Instigator
Chase200mph
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Controverter
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

after all, you are just a Christian

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Controverter
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/31/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 862 times Debate No: 31926
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (6)
Votes (3)

 

Chase200mph

Pro

wolfman4711
So you gave us a tie on sources did you"LOL! The irony that Con"s positions has NONE"but after all, you are just a Christian. Smirk" : ) Perhaps you would like to enter into a debate of what counts as a valid source.
Controverter

Con

I am not JUST A CHRISTIAN. Neither are you.
Debate Round No. 1
Chase200mph

Pro

"I am not JUST A CHRISTIAN. Neither are you.

So I will respond in the spirit of things here".(pun intended) LOL!
All Christian/Judeans/ Islamic are not Christian/Judeans/ Islamic because they are deists as well" they just don"t know it and therefore deny it as a matter of self-imposed ignorance.
The Christian/Judeans/ Islamic religions are all based in polytheism and some of the god"s they use to worship didn"t interfere or interact with man"some like Yahweh did, he demanded human sacrifices preformed on an altar.
http://forbiddengospels.blogspot.com...
Controverter

Con

If you say that Christians are Deists too then you contradicted your own resolution.
Debate Round No. 2
Chase200mph

Pro

Nope, I just looked and my resolution stands". Your turn.
Controverter

Con

I am not just a Christian I am also a debater.
Debate Round No. 3
Chase200mph

Pro

then you contradicted your own resolution...
Controverter

Con

I am con, you are pro.
Debate Round No. 4
Chase200mph

Pro

Oh yeah, I forgot".well then if I look at it while not talking to magical beings there is no meatballs in my spaghetti.
Controverter

Con

Mission accomplished.
Debate Round No. 5
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Chase200mph 4 years ago
Chase200mph
As opposed to this non-debate.....why? :)
Posted by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
I prefer Nur-Ab-Sal's debates.
Posted by Chase200mph 4 years ago
Chase200mph
Nimbus328, so you think an argument was added on the opening do you? LOL...I ask you, how does one argue over a hasty general conditional? : )
Posted by Nimbus328 4 years ago
Nimbus328
Huh?
Posted by Chase200mph 4 years ago
Chase200mph
What does and does not make valid sources"..a debate that explores the ideas that listed sources should contain more than dead links and groups of others that merely share beliefs without support.
Posted by Misterscruffles 4 years ago
Misterscruffles
What is being debated here?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 4 years ago
KingDebater
Chase200mphControverterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made an argument that wasn't refuted.
Vote Placed by Misterscruffles 4 years ago
Misterscruffles
Chase200mphControverterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro presented a nonsensical argument which he did not even follow through on.
Vote Placed by wiploc 4 years ago
wiploc
Chase200mphControverterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro undertook to prove that Con is just a Christian. Pro never showed up with evidence or argument supporting that position.