The Instigator
sinclaire
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
bananaedmonkey
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

antimatter: is it a risk or a big contribution to science?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/7/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 258 times Debate No: 83566
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

sinclaire

Pro

Antimatter is really a big opportunity to change the living of this world. It can even light a country in just a small amount. Antimatter is a big contribution to science and also technology.
bananaedmonkey

Con

I will be arguing that if we discovered how to use antimatter it would have a deadly effect.

premise 1: Last time we discovered something of great power we melted 2 cities.
Therefore antimatter could be as a weapon and being that antimatter is much more powerful entire countries could be destroyed.


premise 2: Dictators
Dictators would be going out of their way to attain a weapon of that size.
Can you imagine the destruction that would ensue if North Korea's dictator got a antimatter bomb?
Debate Round No. 1
sinclaire

Pro

sinclaire forfeited this round.
bananaedmonkey

Con

Pro has Forfeited.
Debate Round No. 2
sinclaire

Pro

sinclaire forfeited this round.
bananaedmonkey

Con

I wonder why people bother posting a debate if they won't debate anything.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.