any action not based on a natural need is evil
Debate Rounds (5)
My Job pimp and moral hero please vote for me I needed to feel valued.
Pro is simply seeking to impose an artificial and indefensible morality what is evil about inaction for no reason at all. Who defines natural here. Why should we be condemned for just doing what we want to do when we want to do it. Surely not for the Planet , The planet is just a car park if we want it to be.
i am not judging any one
im not seeking to impose anything
nature is natural, machine is mechanical
so just feed your kid battery acid, nothing wrong with that, if you want it
morality also involves our species, if you kill the planet you kill everyone, which is immoral
protecting the planet as a shared resource in order to ensure the survival of our species. In terms of Maslow's hierarchy of needs these come pretty low. If people are to be sanctioned for doing things that are not natural like the Chernobyl firefighters who prevented meltdown at the cost of their lives then Pro needs to show that it is natural to give up their lives something the fighters considered to be a no brainer.
jobs are mechanical
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by imabench 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Once again, Pro failed to make a single coherent argument and instead is just wasting server space for Juggle
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.