The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
james1014
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

any action not based on a natural need is evil

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
james1014
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/18/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 289 times Debate No: 77834
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

james1014

Con

If there is something you want and don't need that is not a crime. If you worked hard and want to take you family for diner that is perfectly fine. People all over the world do stuff they want to if we did not the world miserable.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

working is evil, jobs are evil, money destroys human nature
james1014

Con

You need jobs and money to provide for your family and pay bills.
Debate Round No. 2
james1014

Con

You need it because its life you need money for education,entertainment,homes, and a lot more you need money to live.Then you can't buy food and you will starve and no one wants that to happen.
Debate Round No. 3
vi_spex

Pro

did you even read the headline..

does money grow on trees?
james1014

Con

No you get money from a damn job you have to work for money and you can use how you want there is nothing wrong with that.
Debate Round No. 4
vi_spex

Pro

so machines just exist? then comes nature?
james1014

Con

You are making no sense are you saying to print money copy write is against the law. If anyone is a serious about debating the would agree with me because having something you want is fine if we did not we would be siting down doing nothing all day. What is the crime if your child wants a game nothing it's fine he is entertaining himself so that is a good thing.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by james1014 1 year ago
james1014
please someone vote.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by sara_ann_dee 1 year ago
sara_ann_dee
vi_spexjames1014Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side was disrespectful to one another, therefore conduct is tied. PRO did not even bother to capitalize or put ending marks on his sentences - therefore, grammar and spelling goes to CON. Neither side cited or used any resources - so it would be unfair to grant anyone those points since nobody included evidence in their arguments. However, CON successfully rebutted his opponent's argument, and PRO did not even bother to try and make a counterargument for CON's argument. Therefore - CON wins the argumentative section because he was the only side who actually replied to their opponent, and did not show any weakness in their argument.