The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

any flying object is identified as a flying object

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/12/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 339 times Debate No: 84884
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

ufo=alien spaceship? is it even a spaceship? maybe its just light bug hovering between the tree tops
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

This debate is pretty easy, because all I really have to do is piggyback off what PRO himself wrote. If there exists a single unidentified flying object, you vote CON.

First, PRO admits that there is a such thing as a UFO, or an "unidentified flying object." He questions whether this is actually an alien ship: perhaps it's just a light bug. The fact that there exists this uncertainty is a testament to the fact that the object is unidentified. It could be a bug, it could be a spaceship, it could be a plane, it could be a paraglider, and the list goes on and on.

As this link elucidates, there have been plenty of UFO sightings:

http://www.livescience.com...

To this day, we still have not identified these objects. Therefore, not all flying objects are identified.

Vote CON.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by AlwaysRight12345 1 year ago
AlwaysRight12345
vi_spexResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This topic was so nonsensical in that it was so obviously true that it seems that the responsibility rests on Pro to clarify. Since the topic (in my opinion) was completely undefined, all I can vote on is S&G and sources, both of which go to Con.
Vote Placed by Rosalie 1 year ago
Rosalie
vi_spexResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con rightfully proved and argued thatnot all flying objects are identified, which negates the resolution.