are Nike Jordon worth price or not
Debate Rounds (3)
Despite that the shoes are highly popular in America it does not mean that they are the best shoes to buy. There are thousands of other shoe companies that sell shoes. Just because the are in the top 10 in America does not mean they are the best in all the countries together. Also, you can buy several other brands of shoes that are cheaper than buying one pair for one hundred dollars. One pair of shoes should not cost a whole paycheck.
darkdivaox forfeited this round.
thank you for being in this debate with me. I'll just address what was said in the 1st round and do a conclusion.
There are several other types of shoes that have several purposes that range form casual, formal, and sportswear along with several others. The thing about those shoes are that they cost less.
In my opinion, Nike's and Jordan's are only worn because they are expensive and society likes them. We want to be like everybody else and so we conform and join in on all the trends when they really don't matter. At the school I go to students get bullied for wearing run down, raggedy, cheap shoes for no reason and that's not right. We shouldn't make fun of someone who either can't afford expensive Nike's and Jordan's to flaunt around or who really couldn't care less. They are shoes and their only purpose is to protect our feet. Sure, it's okay to look nice in them but not to where you'll spend hundreds of dollars for one pair.
Again, thank you for debating with me and hopefully, we can debate again.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Con gives reasons as to why the shoes are not worth the price. Such as they will eventually break, or get smaller. Pro doesn't refute this, only says "80% say they are worth the price the reason is they are cute," they say that they are on the list of America's top 10 shoes, but provides no link to this source. Con refutes this, essentially saying that the word "cute" is subjective, and other people may find cheaper shoes cute. Pro then forfeits the rest of the debate, leaving Con's argument standing. Due to this, conduct and arguments to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.