The Instigator
darkdivaox
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Blue_Hood
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

are Nike Jordon worth price or not

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Blue_Hood
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/15/2015 Category: Fashion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 764 times Debate No: 75340
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

darkdivaox

Pro

Yes because there for all sports .They can be for all age . They are long last for about 1 and a half years
Blue_Hood

Con

No Nike's are not worth the price. The first reason being that it is ridiculous to pay such an amount for shoes. No pair of shoes, no matter how popular, should cost that much. Also, it is a waste of money to spend hundreds of dollars on one pair of shoes that will eventually break, become too small, or any other situations that could prove to ruin the shoes and make them unfit to wear.
Debate Round No. 1
darkdivaox

Pro

Yes so it does not matter 80% say they are worth the price the reason is they are cute they are long last sure they are all over American it is in the top 10 list of shoes
Blue_Hood

Con

You say the shoes are worth the price because they are, in your words, "cute." Yet it honestly doesn't matter whether or not the shoes are cute. You can find several shoes that are just as "cute" and be worth a considerable amount less than a pair of Nikes or Jordans.
Despite that the shoes are highly popular in America it does not mean that they are the best shoes to buy. There are thousands of other shoe companies that sell shoes. Just because the are in the top 10 in America does not mean they are the best in all the countries together. Also, you can buy several other brands of shoes that are cheaper than buying one pair for one hundred dollars. One pair of shoes should not cost a whole paycheck.
Debate Round No. 2
darkdivaox

Pro

darkdivaox forfeited this round.
Blue_Hood

Con

I don't know what to do now. So,
thank you for being in this debate with me. I'll just address what was said in the 1st round and do a conclusion.
______________

There are several other types of shoes that have several purposes that range form casual, formal, and sportswear along with several others. The thing about those shoes are that they cost less.
In my opinion, Nike's and Jordan's are only worn because they are expensive and society likes them. We want to be like everybody else and so we conform and join in on all the trends when they really don't matter. At the school I go to students get bullied for wearing run down, raggedy, cheap shoes for no reason and that's not right. We shouldn't make fun of someone who either can't afford expensive Nike's and Jordan's to flaunt around or who really couldn't care less. They are shoes and their only purpose is to protect our feet. Sure, it's okay to look nice in them but not to where you'll spend hundreds of dollars for one pair.

_____________
Again, thank you for debating with me and hopefully, we can debate again.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
darkdivaoxBlue_HoodTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gives reasons as to why the shoes are not worth the price. Such as they will eventually break, or get smaller. Pro doesn't refute this, only says "80% say they are worth the price the reason is they are cute," they say that they are on the list of America's top 10 shoes, but provides no link to this source. Con refutes this, essentially saying that the word "cute" is subjective, and other people may find cheaper shoes cute. Pro then forfeits the rest of the debate, leaving Con's argument standing. Due to this, conduct and arguments to Con.