The Instigator
kbishopcs
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
shaduwarsenaal
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

are animals smarter than humans?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
shaduwarsenaal
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/8/2015 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 448 times Debate No: 74987
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

kbishopcs

Pro

animals are smarter than animals for sure!!!!
shaduwarsenaal

Con

I disagree with that statement. Animal cannot reason but instead rely on instinct.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by TBSmothers 2 years ago
TBSmothers
kbishopcsshaduwarsenaalTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: this was a really short debate so there wasn't much to judge it on. The pro and con are fairly even in most areas except for the argument because the con gave a reason why animals are not smarter than humans which was ?Animal cannot reason but instead rely on instinct?. neither side used sources and there conduct and grammar are about the same since they only wrote a sentence a piece
Vote Placed by Phenenas 2 years ago
Phenenas
kbishopcsshaduwarsenaalTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro said a grand total of one thing, and it didn't even turn out right, instead being "animals are smarter than animals". Con gave only a slightly longer argument, but that's all that was needed.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
kbishopcsshaduwarsenaalTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: con has that single shard of evidence/logic that allows him to win against pro.