are boys smarter than the girls?
Debate Rounds (3)
practically,more than 90% firms prefer male CEO's.
if we could not measure intelligent , how could u agree male are smarter than female, or any other way round.
you claim ----practically,more than 90% firms prefer male CEO's.
do higher income/post mean higher intelligent which define as smarter in our argument here?
you claim --- male decisions more accurately and efficiently and on the contrary girls have poor thinking ability .
not all male make better decisions , and not all girl have poor thinking ability , there case of other round too.
basically the smartness is one's intellect
you have not define what intelligence mean, if you could not define it , how could you even assuming A is smarter than B.
you have not ans my question on my first round, and mirroring my question , that stupid . i did not assuming that if someone is better in academic = higher intelligence , that is your assumption .
now you claim----
academic intelligence can only be gained by those who can preferentially afford it whether they are boys or girls.
let me counter you---
almost 1,966,514,816 people in the world have internet in their houses , 3,776,514,876 people in the world have access to education,with current technology information can be easy accessed anytime, academic intelligence is not only preferentially for those who could afford it. academic intelligence is the will to learn, the will to better oneself and others .
i think there no point going on. your claim is totally flowed .
u have written that acedemic intelligence can be attained by those who are willing to attain it,but there are thousands of live examples from second and third world countries where children have enthusiasm for studies,but they can't afford going to school.
With the wide available technology we have to date, information is much more fast,easy to obtain,. compare to 30years ago or before internet are available , do u agree education is wider and more accessible now compare to 30years ago? of course its up to oneself to attained as a "porn" master or "subject" master.
for some second and third world countries where children did not received education, i strongly hope there a great chance for them to be education as my belief are , education should be for every child be it girl or boy.
overall no one should be judged as less smarter, less intelligent . be it lack of education, or be it they are girl or boy.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: The S&G was a notable feature of this debate, but for all the wrong reasons. As Con pointed out, CEO status is not necessarily an indicator of how smart someone is. The rest of Pro's arguments were mere assertions, and weren't really arguments. Besides, Con adequately addressed the crux of Pro's arguments, so arguments to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.