The Instigator
daniel_1234567890
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points
The Contender
chelsearussill
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

are sloth dogs better thn regular dogs

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
daniel_1234567890
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/13/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 401 times Debate No: 54610
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

daniel_1234567890

Pro

Sloth dogs are amazing. i love sloth dogs. regular dogs are not very good.
chelsearussill

Con

i think that sloth dogs are awesome
Debate Round No. 1
daniel_1234567890

Pro

well why does it say you are against sloth dogs?? #weird
chelsearussill

Con

#because thats how u set it up. sloth dogs are #FAB
Debate Round No. 2
daniel_1234567890

Pro

uh no i didnt.... #howcouldanyonebeagainstslothdogs
chelsearussill

Con

im not sure. sloth dogs are really really cool
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by chelsearussill 2 years ago
chelsearussill
#scam city scam scam city
Posted by izzyoxtoby 2 years ago
izzyoxtoby
i agree jordan
Posted by Jordyn_K4 2 years ago
Jordyn_K4
#keepitreal
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Christian_Debater 2 years ago
Christian_Debater
daniel_1234567890chelsearussillTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Not even a debate. I think this debate is a way to earn wins, but I don't know. So regardless, I gave Pro the win for arguments. Con basically forfeited. Nobody used resources, and both had bad grammar. Conduct wise, no insults or anything bad.
Vote Placed by DerKing 2 years ago
DerKing
daniel_1234567890chelsearussillTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: It was hard, but I counted Con having more grammatical errors. Neither used sources. Because they both agreed in favor of the topic, I must give it to Pro. Con made a mistake in that Pro is "saying yes" to the resolution, and it was in fact not set up wrong.