The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

as$ eating

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/6/2016 Category: People
Updated: 6 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 253 times Debate No: 89270
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




yea man im down why not. whats wrong with being a brown noser as long as they wash down there. shlt it might even add flavor so dont wash. and it probably feels good, but idk cus i aint with that gay shlt. the homie brooke likes it tho so fvck yea eat a$s. Oh and if it is dirty at least youll be cleaning it for them, but dont do an@l first. maybe even give him a suprise and shlt in his mouth, spice things up a bit. ik thatd turn me in, classic 2 girls 1 cup type of shlt. #fvck bltches make money


This boys and girls , is Yaboiroge . Say hi to Yaboi.
Just 4 years ago Yaboi had a stable job a loving partner and a great family life.
1 night Yaboi went out in town with some "good friends" as he done so before. But this time, 1 of Yabois friends offered him some crack. Yaboi accepted.
From that moment on life would never be the same again. Yaboi's life spiraled out of control he lost everything he ever loved. And is now this pathetic mess we see before us now. So kids. Say no to man crack.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Hoppi 6 months ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Brilliantly argued by Con. Pro's arguments focussed on the immediate sensations and pleasures of as$ eating, whereas Con took a broader perspective and invited readers to consider long term effects of the sorts of animal-pleasure behaviors that Pro's argument not only describes but illustrates by example. So meta. Also Con - by embedding his argument in a broader context - was more emotionally compelling. Under ordinary circumstances, I would give Con conduct too, because of his compassionate approach towards Pro, but I fear that such a rfd, relying as it does not on a specific quote, would unleash the wrath of the mods. So conduct is tied, but thank you to Con for his compassionate approach.