Debate Rounds (1)
Just 4 years ago Yaboi had a stable job a loving partner and a great family life.
1 night Yaboi went out in town with some "good friends" as he done so before. But this time, 1 of Yabois friends offered him some crack. Yaboi accepted.
From that moment on life would never be the same again. Yaboi's life spiraled out of control he lost everything he ever loved. And is now this pathetic mess we see before us now. So kids. Say no to man crack.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Hoppi 6 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Brilliantly argued by Con. Pro's arguments focussed on the immediate sensations and pleasures of as$ eating, whereas Con took a broader perspective and invited readers to consider long term effects of the sorts of animal-pleasure behaviors that Pro's argument not only describes but illustrates by example. So meta. Also Con - by embedding his argument in a broader context - was more emotionally compelling. Under ordinary circumstances, I would give Con conduct too, because of his compassionate approach towards Pro, but I fear that such a rfd, relying as it does not on a specific quote, would unleash the wrath of the mods. So conduct is tied, but thank you to Con for his compassionate approach.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.