The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Sxilenced
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

ask vi

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Sxilenced
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/27/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 843 times Debate No: 83112
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (38)
Votes (3)

 

vi_spex

Pro

you cant ask me a question i dont know the answer to or have the answer to
Sxilenced

Con

This question is false?
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

no i dont have to imagine it
Sxilenced

Con

You already did.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

i see it on my screen
Sxilenced

Con

...And that's all it takes.
Debate Round No. 3
38 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
the question being false is equevelant to walking through physical constructs, like words on a document in my hand
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
paradox..
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
a question is not an assertion..
Posted by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
Con's question is a paradox. "This question is false?" If it was false, then the question is correct. If the question was correct saying it's false, then it's assertion saying it is false is false.
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
You have to be a troll. No one can support reason while denying reason and pretend to be God while denying God exists.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
trolls call me troll
Posted by Sxilenced 1 year ago
Sxilenced
Oh my lolXD you are a troll through and through
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
Alright you're high again. Log on when you're sober.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
because i dont see religion anywhere
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
Why does that make sense?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by persianimmortal 1 year ago
persianimmortal
vi_spexSxilencedTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: One lined arguments are are for the bold and confident. If you can't do it then admittance to your incapacity is the best place to start over. Best of luck next time junior
Vote Placed by Forever23 1 year ago
Forever23
vi_spexSxilencedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: The pro didn't capitalize i's or put periods at the end of sentences. Also, con asked a paradox question to which pro did not know the answer to... So obviously he proved that vi doesn't know everything. So that's why I gave him the arguments point. Pro didn't prove the BOP.
Vote Placed by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
vi_spexSxilencedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I think the only way to vote is to see that vi essentially said he didn't have to imagine the question, which implies that if he did then he would lose (only argument provided). In the round afterward he admitted to seeing the question on his screen which qualifies as him perceiving the question with his mind. He acknowledged the question, and that means vi was definitely asked a question. And that means that con fulfilled his burden. Vi didn't answer the question. The assumed burden would be that Vi answers the question, because the debate is to ask vi. Vi never answered the question, so his burden was dropped. Thus, con wins.