The Instigator
jackcraw007
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Con (against)
Winning
17 Points

auron is the best final fantasy fighter

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/23/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 414 times Debate No: 76841
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

jackcraw007

Pro

come on he is a warrior monk that is extremely cool and he has a cool backstory
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

I accept. PRO has the sole burden of proof to demonstrate that Auron is the objectively the best final fantasy fighter. In the process, he must be able to prove to us that there's an objective standard for what "best" means in this context. Otherwise, this is nothing more than his subjective opinion and cannot affirm. Thus, for his points to have any impact, he needs to first establish a criteria for objectivity.

At this point, the only points that he has made - that he is a warrior monk, that he is extremely cool, and that he has a cool backstory - cannot affirm. First, he provides no evidence for these. Second, the last two involve an obvious opinion judgment, rather than an objective framework. Three, he doesn't tell us what makes him best. To do that, he needs to offer some means of comparison to other final fantasy fighters to prove that Auron trumps the other.

In the absence of this, PRO cannot affirm, so you vote CON by default.
Debate Round No. 1
jackcraw007

Pro

jackcraw007 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
jackcraw007

Pro

jackcraw007 forfeited this round.
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

Extend. PRO's burden of proof remains unfulfilled.

Therefore, vote CON.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by tejretics 2 years ago
tejretics
jackcraw007ResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
jackcraw007ResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff, pro was very subjective
Vote Placed by AngelofDeath 2 years ago
AngelofDeath
jackcraw007ResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: BoP on Pro, which he did not support, and FF (and also what Rev said)
Vote Placed by philochristos 2 years ago
philochristos
jackcraw007ResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeit
Vote Placed by RevNge 2 years ago
RevNge
jackcraw007ResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF, so Conduct to Con. I give the arguments to Con as Pro did not fulfill his BoP and failed to give any objective arguments (you're still a noobsniper, Joey).