The Instigator
ayyylmao
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Balacafa
Con (against)
Winning
16 Points

ayy lmaos

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Balacafa
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/21/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 961 times Debate No: 79960
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (5)

 

ayyylmao

Pro

do ayy lmaos exist
Balacafa

Con

I accept and would like to request definitions from my opponent.
Debate Round No. 1
ayyylmao

Pro

ayyylmao forfeited this round.
Balacafa

Con

I assume that my opponent means aliens by ayy Imaos. The BoP is on my opponent so if they do not argue then I win. They have also forfeited so points go to Con.

I'll post 1 argument in case anybody thinks that this isn't enough.

Argument

When we look out with our most powerful telescopes, we don't see anything.


Fermi's Paradox (Where is everyone?)

If Aliens visited 150 million years ago and found dinosaurs, they would have left an obelisk or some other marker, or left something in our orbit.

We are alone. Accept this fact based on the evidence.

In the 3 billion years that this planet has supported life, some civilization should have passed through and left something (even accidentally), yet we have nothing.
Debate Round No. 2
ayyylmao

Pro

ayyylmao forfeited this round.
Balacafa

Con

Extend. BoP on Pro.
Debate Round No. 3
ayyylmao

Pro

ayyylmao forfeited this round.
Balacafa

Con

BoP remains unfufilled.
Debate Round No. 4
ayyylmao

Pro

ayyylmao forfeited this round.
Balacafa

Con

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Balacafa 1 year ago
Balacafa
cool
Posted by ayyylmao 1 year ago
ayyylmao
ayy lmao ayy lmao ayy lmao
Posted by Balacafa 1 year ago
Balacafa
Do u mean the alien one? Like on your profile?
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
ayyylmaoBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
MagicAintReal
ayyylmaoBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: The vote is clear, unlike the resolution. Pro forfeited every round except the first round, which had no coherent point in it at all. Pro's incoherence was influenced by poor spelling and grammar. For these two reasons Conduct and S&G to Con. The resolution isn't a resolution, so i must go with what has been provided, and the only resolution provided was Con's. Seeing that Pro never responds to Con's points about ancient aliens would have left an obelisk and that we haven't seen any aliens with our best equipment, so we have no reason to believe that aliens have been here. Arguments to Con. there were no sources.
Vote Placed by Sarai.K82 1 year ago
Sarai.K82
ayyylmaoBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had this going away. Pro never offered persuasive arguments. Pro failed to continue the debate. Con had a better traditional use of English spelling and grammar. Initially, I thought Con had a hard row to hoe, but in the end I was persuaded. I still think Pro would have had an easy debate if Pro had simply shown up and laid out a few of the obvious counter arguments.
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
ayyylmaoBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con only made arguments. Pro ff'ed all rounds.
Vote Placed by ESocialBookworm 1 year ago
ESocialBookworm
ayyylmaoBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF