The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
BlueUpQuark
Con (against)
Winning
10 Points

ban islam

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
BlueUpQuark
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/17/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 310 times Debate No: 95457
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (8)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

muslims will have to fight the demons they raise themselves.. noses of vengeful wolves
https://www.youtube.com...
BlueUpQuark

Con

You've made no legitimate argument for why we should ban Islam. First off, you're obviously referring to the Islam that that the extremists practice. These extremists have their own interpretation of the Quran, a violent one at that. But what about peaceful Muslims? Peaceful Muslims may have their own peaceful interpretation. Should their version of Islam be banned?

Also, not even the extreme version of Islam should be banned. Everyone should have the ability to practice whatever religion they want without censorship. As long as they don't harm anyone, they should be okay.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

islam is the argument for why islam should be banned.. and no arguments can exist to the contrary.. just claims
BlueUpQuark

Con

I don't understand how Islam can itself be an argument against it. You didn't even explain why that's so. Good debate.
Debate Round No. 2
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by canis 2 months ago
canis
Have to agree with vi_spex. This religion argues against its own existence....
Posted by vi_spex 2 months ago
vi_spex
islam argues against its own existence.. and as an admission of forfeit you didnt bring an argument
Posted by vi_spex 2 months ago
vi_spex
a religion can not be reformed.. it is retarded and never changing based on the insanity of its everlasting drivel.. books do not change
Posted by vi_spex 2 months ago
vi_spex
reform.. lolol

so allah will come down and change his word.. who purposefully dropped you as a child on a daily basis?
Posted by Vivec 2 months ago
Vivec
i see the apologist in the comment section: hello again. I disagree with banning Islam, but I do agree that something whose interpretations can vary from decent as best to disgustingly evil at worst has no place in the modern world without reform. This is Islam's fundamental problem: No authoritative body. Why do you think they've been at war with each other for thousands of years? because they disagree on who should be the head of the faith, Muhammad's disciples or his family.

Christianity has had reforms, Judaism has as well. When a Jew or christian commits evil, theyre there to condemn it based on the legislated laws and dogma. Islam does not. We have the word of terrorists and moderates at best when it comes to islamic violence (and by islamic violence I mean a dude holding people up at a store screaming ALLAHUAKBAR, like in the last week.)

Islam needs reform for the world to accept it. This is an undeniable fact that has to be addressed, unless Islam wants to see more people like Donald Trump wanting to keep them out.
Posted by vi_spex 2 months ago
vi_spex
Quran 8:12
When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will
cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off
every fingertip of them
Posted by vi_spex 2 months ago
vi_spex
oh, actual proof to your claim ;)
Posted by CuriousFear 2 months ago
CuriousFear
vi spex at it again
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by TVDB 2 months ago
TVDB
vi_spexBlueUpQuarkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro just didn't have an argument so....
Vote Placed by Swimwithcats 2 months ago
Swimwithcats
vi_spexBlueUpQuarkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: It seems obvious that Pro provided little support for reasons for the ban. Con gave a basic argument in refutation and pro justifies his first argument by saying that all you can do is make claims. Awful. But I will say that Con should have made a further elaboration in round two, but it's obvious who was the winner here.