The Instigator
J03ybatts
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
JohnMaynardKeynes
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

bar fughts be good eh?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
JohnMaynardKeynes
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/4/2014 Category: Cars
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 635 times Debate No: 59964
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

J03ybatts

Pro

eh eets batts. na i donk know mmoch bat a week preck en ah girrafte, but i know dem elephants goat sim meaty ol whoppers. na when drenk ona da ber, who dont lik a good el fught? no ya wee preeks be mad cus ya loose but i fack oop me irush ponents an dey be creyin hom to mommeh eh? drunken es good vrywhur n i dont lik me ber en pac ofseex.

fack oof con
JohnMaynardKeynes

Con

Pro has the BOP, and has provided an incoherent statement without a single credible argument. I will offer several arguments that will go unrefuted.


C1) Conceptions of "good" are subjective, not objective, so Pro cannot uphold this resolution.


C2) Fights are generally speaking normatively bad because violence leads to physical and personal harm


C3) When people are drunk they lose control of their actions, meaning that they're more likely to act on impulse, thus leading to more gratuitous violence.

Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Dennybug 2 years ago
Dennybug
J03ybattsJohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: con shw me bar fghts not good. I lke cons argumentos bettar.cause makes moar sense den pros' if u hav prblm wth RFD cm talk to me and i fight u
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
J03ybattsJohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro really didn't argue anything.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
J03ybattsJohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro has BOP. Bad grammar.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
J03ybattsJohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: PRO DID NOTHING
Vote Placed by GOP 2 years ago
GOP
J03ybattsJohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's usage of spelling and grammar was not good.