The Instigator
MeganLoaskia
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points
The Contender
Korashk
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

being annoyed because of "breaking a nail" is not superficial

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/21/2010 Category: Society
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,006 times Debate No: 11496
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (4)

 

MeganLoaskia

Pro

Random debate but thought i would start it anyway, :)
Korashk

Con

I look forward to my opponent's case, I will refute it and present my own once she does.
Debate Round No. 1
MeganLoaskia

Pro

The statement" oh ive broke a nail" is seen as minor clash between fakeness and a steretypical minor inury for "superficial girls"
Although breaking a nail is minor in comparsion to other inuries it can cause sustained Pain and even hospitalisation,
Many famous guitarist"s have manicures in case of them having a nail broken thus affecting their guitar playing.
Other nail breaking inuries include subungual hematoma which causes mountless pain, of the ripping of a nail.thus causing annoyance.
Korashk

Con

The only people that need to worry about breaking their nails are those that have their nails done for reasons such as increasing their attractiveness. There's no real value to having nice-looking, long fingernails. The nails break because of how they are maintained. If said person had not been so superficial their nail would not have broken as easy

In rebuttal, having significant pain upgrades the broken nail from annoying to a problem. Hospitals are serious and greater than annoyances.
Debate Round No. 2
MeganLoaskia

Pro

MeganLoaskia forfeited this round.
Korashk

Con

I might as well finish my argument.

Argument:
I do not think that it is an absurd statement to say that for the most part those that complain about broken nails are doing so because they had previously spent money to make their nails look good. Therefore complaining about it is a superficial thing.

Rebuttal:
///Many famous guitarist"s have manicures in case of them having a nail broken thus affecting their guitar playing.///

My opponent has not given a source for this information
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Korashk 6 years ago
Korashk
I don't like crazy long debates either but 500 characters is like one paragraph.
Posted by MeganLoaskia 6 years ago
MeganLoaskia
Because I'm sick of long interminable debates, wanted to keep this one short
Posted by Koopin 6 years ago
Koopin
Dang Korashk, that would make me so mad.
Posted by Korashk 6 years ago
Korashk
I didn't know that this was a 500 character debate when I took it >_<. I had a full response typed out in Google Docs but when I copy-pasted it the argument bow was like, DENIED!!!
Posted by Fr0stbit3 6 years ago
Fr0stbit3
If you post an argument i would be glad to accept con
Posted by Koopin 6 years ago
Koopin
You should post an argument.
Posted by Nails 6 years ago
Nails
Interesting debate. I've never broken a nail, but I think I'd be inclined to agree with CON.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by xxdarkxx 6 years ago
xxdarkxx
MeganLoaskiaKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by MeganLoaskia 6 years ago
MeganLoaskia
MeganLoaskiaKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Koopin 6 years ago
Koopin
MeganLoaskiaKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by Korashk 6 years ago
Korashk
MeganLoaskiaKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05