The Instigator
Pro (for)
7 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

being evolution

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/30/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 464 times Debate No: 92087
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (6)
Votes (1)




if humans cut of a single finger in a moment of life or death as a rule.. eventually we will be able to regrow our limbs.. like the tail of a lizard, because the lizard that survives getting grabbed by the tail will survive can survive it


That is not how evolution works. Evolution does not simply see a need and fix it. According to Charles Darwin, evolution shapes living things so that they will be able to survive and reproduce. Simply cutting off a finger will not affect a human's ability to survive and reproduce, assuming it is treated with proper care, i.e. preventing disease etc. The reason it works with lizards is because lizards need their tail to survive. If it is ripped off, the lizard will die and will be unable to reproduce. Then the adaptation came along, and those who grew their tail back flourished, while those who didn't grow it back wouldn't survive.
Debate Round No. 1


the lizards that cant lose their tails have less chance of surviving getting catched by the tail"

no no, some lizards can drop their tails and a new one will grow


That is exactly what I am saying. The lizards that got the adaptation to grow the tail back flourished, while the ones that still couldn't grow it back died. That is natural selection, but it only works if the adaptation helps the species survive and reproduce. Even if this adaptation did happen, it would still be extremely rare, because those who can regenerate their fingers will not be any better at surviving and reproducing than those who can't.
Thank you to vi_spex for giving me this opportunity to debate.
Vote for CON because my arguments are based on actual science.
Debate Round No. 2
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by whiteflame 2 years ago
>Reported vote: H501// Mod action: Removed<

7 points to Con. Reasons for voting decision: Con was obviously the winner. Homely Sherlock, Con did not argue Pro's point, he was fixing a mistake Pro made. Pro argued that evolution is instantaneous and fixes everything. Pro was wrong, and Con proved this. Con had better spelling, actually used sources, and had a clear, concise argument. They were tied for conduct, but I chose Con since he has been the victim of an unfair votebomb and that needs to be fixed. I hope my own "votebomb for justice" is understood.

[*Reason for removal*] (1) The voter does not explain S&G or sources, merely restating the point allocations. (2) The explanation for conduct is prohibited. This is essentially a counter vote bomb. If the voter finds the other vote problematic, then report that vote. Do not award more points to counter it. (3) Arguments are insufficiently explained. The voter explains why another voter is incorrect in his evaluation, but not why Con's arguments won him the debate.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
genetic code is equal to physical form
Posted by SirSocrates 2 years ago
No, it won't.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
a finger will regrow genetically for the male to fit the genes of the child
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
speed of typing, professional leader of ideas
Posted by LuckyScientist 2 years ago
What? What is the motion here? Are you just proffering ideas?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by HomelySherlock 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Con proved Pro's point, since he was Con but argued as Pro