if humans cut of a single finger in a moment of life or death as a rule.. eventually we will be able to regrow our limbs.. like the tail of a lizard, because the lizard that survives getting grabbed by the tail will survive can survive it
a finger will regrow genetically for the male to fit the genes of the child
evolution=live or die=life or death=survival+adaptation
evolution=any difference between any being
Some of us believe that our finger tip can regrow after being cut but it's not so with our whole limbs or arms....why so??? because we have lost that biological system of regeneration..... And this comes from the interpretation of Darwinian theory of evolution.....but let me first ask you a question ...even up to this day, not even 10% of the biological species are known...and even to most of these species Darwinian theory doesn't comply.... Then how could you believe the evolution theory to be a fact?????
Evolution is a scientific concept....but it's still a theory...and theory can't be a fact every time....your belief in nature but disbelief in science shows your insufficient knowledge about the very basic definition of science.....you don't believe in science but yet arguing over evolution which itself is a scientific concept.....your whole notion about science is ludicrous my friend...
You, my friend, can't claim a single argument up to this date of scientific advancement , in favour of evolution..(check some valid scientific sources and read some good article on Darwinism). Believing in evolution is just like believing in some 'Bigfoot'..but you can't prove anything about it's existence. You can't just get away by proclaiming something without a valid argument in favour of your motion. For me and majority of people alongside my notion accept that Theory of Evolution "may" be true , but it "is" not true.... Think about people living in arctic, the Eskimos, why don't their skin have evolved ? Why don't they have thick skin to preserve fats??? Why do they have dark skin instead of white ??? Don't you think theory of evolution can't be considered a fact or a law until it's universally accepted?? Well think about it and rectify your views ...
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was correct, but did not capitalize and did not make a clear argument. However, Con's argument came across as a little rude in places (intentional or not). Nobody used sources. Neither Pro nor Con did well.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.