belief is a blind man seeing
a highly intelligent worm describing a rainbow is a worm believing
To define "See":
verb (used with object), saw, seen, seeing.
1. to perceive with the eyes; look at.
2. to view; visit or attend as a spectator:
to see a play.
3. to perceive by means of computer vision.
4. to scan or view, especially by electronic means:
The satellite can see the entire southern half of the country.
5. to perceive (things) mentally; discern; understand:
to see the point of an argument.
6. to construct a mental image of; visualize:
He still saw his father as he was 25 years ago.
7. to accept or imagine or suppose as acceptable:
I can't see him as president.
"I see", says the blind man, with his optic nerves deadened and useless. His mind's eye still perceives. The blind man touches a computer screen and in his mind he views a flat surface. We see a computer screen and information lays upon it. The true sight of the computer screen includes viewing the entire spectrum of electromagnetic waves coming off of it.
Ladies and gentlemen, I argue that there is more to sight than light rays. The blind man is not blind by the other meaning of "see", for he can perceive our world. More blind, less blind? We all only perceive so much, and the rest is our belief. We all believe what we think we know, even with some evidence to support it.
There is nothing beyond belief, for nothing is concretely true.
to see through the eye of belief is no different then seeing through the eyes of a blind man
the worm has no eyes to see the rainbow and so it dosnt know of rainbows, sight allows revelations of pure light..
Seeing is not knowing, but seeing is believing. Belief is incorporated into everything we do. You claim to believe is to do something without the physical evidence of such, if I interpreted it correctly. Well, naught that we do has concrete evidence. Prove to me that life is true, for that was merely an unfounded claim on your part.
life is not can be
if dreams are real then nightmares are real, and reality is imaginary
false=dead, not life
how do you prove what is real if there is no real, and i just disproved both your statements
you are asking..... me to prove.... with a non real reality that reality is not real, in reality
Nothing can be known to be real given our limited senses.
I thank everybody for reading this odd debate.