The Instigator
samurai
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Blade-of-Truth
Con (against)
Winning
44 Points

blacks caused 9/11

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
Blade-of-Truth
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/10/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 839 times Debate No: 56380
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (9)
Votes (9)

 

samurai

Pro

dem niggas be trippin on r buildings dem racist negros
Blade-of-Truth

Con

Since your last opponent was also undefeated, it's only proper I take this one.

I accept. Please begin.
Debate Round No. 1
samurai

Pro

samurai forfeited this round.
Blade-of-Truth

Con

Since this is a 5 round debate, I will graciously provide my opponent with one more opportunity to begin the debate.

As both Pro and Instigator, it is only proper that my opponent begin first and uphold his BOP. If my opponent fails to respond in the next round, I will present my argument in negation of the resolution.

I now return the floor to Pro.
Debate Round No. 2
samurai

Pro

samurai forfeited this round.
Blade-of-Truth

Con

I will extend the opportunity once more, for Pro to begin.

If Pro does not begin in the next round, then I will have no choice but to present my arguments in negation of the Resolution.
Debate Round No. 3
samurai

Pro

samurai forfeited this round.
Blade-of-Truth

Con

I. None of the hijackers involved were of African American ethnicity.

Please take a moment to examine the image I have shared below:


Source - http://911review.com...

As the audience and my opponent can see, the hijackers involved were all of Middle Eastern ethnicity. None of them were African-American.

To further prove this point, I am including a link to the official FBI page which also expands on the identities of the hijackers involved in the 9/11 attack. [2]

[2] http://www.fbi.gov...

I will gladly expand on this point if my opponent responds.

II. There is no proof that shows that blacks were the cause of 9/11.

As Pro, my opponent has the obligation to show the audience, beyond the shadow of doubt, that the 9/11 attacks were caused by blacks. So far, my opponent has failed to do this, and therefore has failed at upholding the BOP placed on him by going against the status quo which recognizes that the individuals involved were of Middle Eastern origin, not African or "black".

Until he does this, there is nothing that upholds his position in this debate.

In Conclusion,

I have presented my arguments as well as provided a rebuttal against the initial claim made by my opponent. My opponent has also, up to this point, failed at maintaining the burden placed on him.

I now return the floor to my opponent.
Debate Round No. 4
samurai

Pro

samurai forfeited this round.
Blade-of-Truth

Con

My opponent has forfeited his final round.

I am disappointed that this debate amounted to no arguments or rebuttals being raised by my opponent.

I currently have arguments that stand unchallenged and therefore extend them.

I would like to thank my opponent for starting this thought-provoking debate. I ask that the audience please take into consideration the forfeits committed by my opponent throughout the debate while voting.

Thank you.
Debate Round No. 5
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by GodChoosesLife 2 years ago
GodChoosesLife
I actually thought about taking up this debate. Best wishes to both.
Posted by NiamC 2 years ago
NiamC
*burn
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
@Eonshadow: Learn to spell properly before ranting, please!!

I counted 7 grammatical and spelling errors in your comment. Go read an English dictionary before you cause anyone else to lose brain cells from reading your 2nd grade level writing.
Posted by NiamC 2 years ago
NiamC
well, this is going to be a serious debate, isn't it?
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
and no, it isn't a dick joke.
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
Start a hang-out. I've got a great reply to your comment but don't want to put it in text on this site hahaha.
Posted by progressivedem22 2 years ago
progressivedem22
Well....that's a big gun....

*cowers in fear*
Posted by progressivedem22 2 years ago
progressivedem22
lol sniped.
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by NiamC 2 years ago
NiamC
samuraiBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: If he is gonna say da N word, he should have at least an argument. gawd.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
samuraiBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff
Vote Placed by MrJosh 2 years ago
MrJosh
samuraiBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeit
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
samuraiBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Woeful. ff
Vote Placed by kyro90 2 years ago
kyro90
samuraiBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I honestly have nothing to say. O.O Like literally this was the most useless debate in history. XD No means of insult though.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
samuraiBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
samuraiBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Too biased against retardation to grade arguments... However S&G is no contest, as pro does not even know how to spell the N. word. Conduct for FF. Sources are a no contest, con had two websites and a picture, one of the websites was a .gov which is of high value, and the picture clearly showed the hijackers were not black.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 2 years ago
bladerunner060
samuraiBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: A full forfeit from Pro, who, in addition to losing conduct for the forfeits, loses arguments for the lack of case, S&G for the abysmal S&G he provided, and loses sources for Con's provision of them.
Vote Placed by Mikal 2 years ago
Mikal
samuraiBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: ff