The Instigator
amu03
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
STALIN
Con (against)
Winning
17 Points

can pit bulls be pets?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
STALIN
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/7/2014 Category: Games
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 904 times Debate No: 48643
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

amu03

Pro

go pitbulls
STALIN

Con

Pit bulls cannot be pets. They are dangerous and wild animals and thus can not be pets. One of those things can bite your fingers off [1].

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by hailz1212 3 years ago
hailz1212
pitbulls should be allowed to be pets because they are just like any other dog, pitbulls arent even on the top three list of dogs that bite people. their behavior depends on how the owners treat them and how they raise them, same with any other dog breed.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
amu03STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gave arguments with sources, had better grammar, and earns conduct because this is a one round debate.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
amu03STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was only one to argue and use sources.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
amu03STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made arguments and had a source.