The Instigator
riclanda
Pro (for)
Losing
22 Points
The Contender
imnotmuchforarguments
Con (against)
Winning
30 Points

catholicism hgas all the anwsers

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/17/2007 Category: Religion
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,946 times Debate No: 585
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (14)
Votes (16)

 

riclanda

Pro

It has all the background. it has all the anwsers becase of the cathecism. it is alwasys out of the bible. catholicism is right. it is always right.
imnotmuchforarguments

Con

I THINK THAT SOME OF IT IS VERY DIFFERENT FOR EXAMPLE PERGATORY THE BIBILE HAS NOTHGIN TO SAY ABOUT IT YET IT'S TAUGHT IN THE CHURCH I THINK THEAT IT SHOULD BE TAUGHT 100% FROM THE BIBLE
Debate Round No. 1
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by joze14rock 9 years ago
joze14rock
Masterworks:

The Torah, to the Jews are the first 5 books of the Old Testament
(Genesis, Leviticus, Exodus, Deuteronomy, Numbers)

I think you meant the TANAKH - their Holy Book, which consists of the

Torah, Neviim, Kiiev, etc

I find it shocking that if Christians are just going to rip off their religion based on another religion (Judaism)
they would at least have the respect to understand the religion their ripping it off from.
Posted by imnotmuchforarguments 9 years ago
imnotmuchforarguments
OH....AND JUST FOR FUN I'LL ADD TO YOUR JUNJ LOAD OF CRAPPY COMMENTS
THE WORST DEBATE EVER
Posted by imnotmuchforarguments 9 years ago
imnotmuchforarguments
OH OH OH AND SHUT UP ALL OF YOU...........YOUUUUUU DON'T KNOW ME
Posted by imnotmuchforarguments 9 years ago
imnotmuchforarguments
AND YES THE CAPS ARE NECESSARY ALL OF YOU HAVE HATE ISSUES
Posted by imnotmuchforarguments 9 years ago
imnotmuchforarguments
you all suck my friend has issues with typing ok!!!!!!
leave him a lone plus we are really good friends and this debate was just a joke don't take it so seriously
IN OHTER WORDS WE WERE DOING BAD ON PURPOSE
Posted by Masterworks 9 years ago
Masterworks
Regardless of all the typos, I agree with riclanda. I, along with millions of other Catholics, have tried and tried to disprove our own faith in search of the truth, and we simply cannot, usually because of statements straight from the CCC (Catechism of the Catholic Church). Think: The Catholic Church has existed for over 2,000 years. What are the chances that not one person had found "faults" with the Church until over 1,300 years later? Very unlikely. Also, why should Catholicism be taught 100% from the Bible? The Catechism defines faith as, and I quote, "the theological virtue by which we believe in God, all that He has revealed to us [the Bible], and all that the Holy Church proposes for our belief."
One last point to all the Jews here:
In both of our sets of holy books (Torah, Bible), we are promised a Savior. God sends us prophets to tell us this, and also of other things to come. Then Jesus comes and proclaims that He is God's only Son. Why do you not believe that this is true? Would you truly go as far as to say that God would send a CORRUPT prophet? One that TRICKS people into believing in Him? Where is the sense in this?
Posted by Harlan 9 years ago
Harlan
You should at least spell the title right.
Posted by Ozymandias 9 years ago
Ozymandias
I cannot, in good conscience, vote for either of these debaters. After reading the Pro, I was sure that I'd vote for the Con, but... he was just as bad.
Posted by Creed-Diskenth 9 years ago
Creed-Diskenth
My god you guys are awful debaters! What's with all the typos?
Posted by schoolglutton 9 years ago
schoolglutton
This is a case of across the board negligence.
16 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by josh_42 8 years ago
josh_42
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by BahiraMalika 9 years ago
BahiraMalika
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by joze14rock 9 years ago
joze14rock
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Masterworks 9 years ago
Masterworks
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Araj 9 years ago
Araj
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by afeinberg 9 years ago
afeinberg
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Fenrir 9 years ago
Fenrir
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by wheelhouse3 9 years ago
wheelhouse3
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by sagarous 9 years ago
sagarous
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Lacan 9 years ago
Lacan
riclandaimnotmuchforargumentsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03