Debate Rounds (3)
I stand in negation of the resolution, whatever the resolution may be pertaining cavemen and simulating them, for one major reason that will be the crux of my case: cavemen do not have sauce.
WITHOUT SAUCE YOU ARE IN A STATE OF ONTOLOGICAL DAMNATION BECAUSE WITHOUT SAUCE YOU ARE LOST. WE HAVE ACQUIRED SAUCE BUT ARE NOT LOST IN THE SAUCE. THEY CLEARLY HAVE NO SAUCE. DON'T VOTE FOR ANY OF THEIR ARGUMENTS UNLESS THEY ACQUIRE SAUCE BECAUSE THEY ARE LOST. THEY CANNOT ACQUIRE THIS SAUCE BECAUSE THEY ARE CAVEMEN. THE ALT IS TO GIVE THEM SAUCE, SOLVES THEIR ONTOLOGICAL DAMNATION. THIS OUTWEIGHS POLICY ARGUMENTS. GO HOME. OVADOSE OF SAUCE.
Gucci Mane 2012 in an interview with Vice:
DATXDUDE forfeited this round.
My argument was dropped - extend my Gucci Mane 2012 card.
Maybe contact his agent. Extend <3
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Rosalie 9 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro FF. Con is the only one who made a logical, valid argument. Pro dropped Con's case. Con didn't even make a case.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.