cell phone use in school
Debate Rounds (3)
1. use the phone in the front office-most if not all schools nowadays have them
2. use your cellphone
what my school does and most other schools do is have students place cellphones in a box at the beginning of class. thus if there is an emergency the students may easily access it and the phone is not a distraction in class. Just because someone may use the argument that phones can be an educational tool, as of 2009 97% of teachers had at least one computer in the class at all times, this number has undoubtedly gone up over the last 6 years and teachers can access a computer lab so using a phone to access the internet is not very smart. otherwise how could apps that many students actually use like snapchat, facebook, twitter, vine, skype, and others could have any educational value whatsoever.
to close this debate schools purpose is to teach students how to use their brains to be independent and successful individuals. technology's purpose is generally to make a task easier. almost all computers take the load off of our brains and onto themselves so we do not have to do virtually anything. this defeats the purpose of school so cellphones should not be used for school purposes in most circumstances.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Peepette 10 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: All is tied with conduct, spelling and source material. R1, Con adequately rebuts Pros claims with alternatives for communication and information, as well as reasoning why phones should be banned. R2 Pro misinterprets Cons premise; Con restates. R3, Pro?s comment ?students will always find a way? is off point on why phones should be allowed. Pro also concedes with exception. Pro fails to make adequate argument against Cons rebuttals and concedes on the basic premise of the debate. Con for the win.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.