chess is a more brain challenging game than any other board game
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
phantom
| Started: | 4/19/2012 | Category: | Education |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 800 times | Debate No: | 22991 |
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)
|
in chess you must think about not only your move but the other pesons also. and in the other games like buzz word or clue. you have to be 3 move ahead to win esiliy. and have fun.
Small character limit... Advanced Squad Leader A strategy game that took several years to develop with dozens of pages of complicated rules. Hard to get tougher than that. Go "While the baroque rules of Chess could only have been created by humans, the rules of Go are so elegant, organic, and rigorously logical that if intelligent life forms exist elsewhere in the universe, they almost certainly play go." Edward Lansker There are far more options to chose from in Go, making stratagem harder, and therefore more challenging. It has been shown that whereas chess players use almost entirely the left side of the brain, Go "fully utilizes/integrates analytic (left brain) and artistic/pattern recognition (right brain) functions." ___ Pros sole argument is that in chess you have to think about the other persons move as well as your own, but that is the same in almost every board game. Therefore pro completely fails to meet his BOP. http://users.eniinternet.com... |
![]() |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 1 year ago
| jimloyd | phantom | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro needed to make some argument that applied to all board games other than chess. He only argued that chess requires looking ahead, a common feature of board games. Con had excellent references for Go. The burden of proof was not met.
Vote Placed by blazeratman 1 year ago
| jimloyd | phantom | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not use any sources, or even reasonably convincing arguments.
Vote Placed by Travniki 1 year ago
| jimloyd | phantom | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: One round debates...woot...







