The Instigator
VS4EVA
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
JacobAnderson
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points

child abuse- are children to be blamed

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
JacobAnderson
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/23/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 366 times Debate No: 49771
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

VS4EVA

Con

no children are not to be blamed,... if they are why should they be blamed?
JacobAnderson

Pro

Okay, I'll accept this debate arguing that children are to be blamed for child abuse.
Debate Round No. 1
VS4EVA

Con

why do you blame them?
JacobAnderson

Pro

Okay, clearly this isn't going to be an official debate. That being said, there is no point in why I should defend my case and negate yours.
Debate Round No. 2
VS4EVA

Con

can I have your opinion on why you think children are to be blamed. I know this is not an official debate but I am doing an investigation on this topic for my college. so can you/ will you mind helping me? tq :)
JacobAnderson

Pro

I don't actually blame children, however, if this had been an official debate, I would have researched the reasoning. If you didn't want an official debate, you should have posted an opinion or a forum, sorry.
Debate Round No. 3
VS4EVA

Con

VS4EVA forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
VS4EVA

Con

VS4EVA forfeited this round.
JacobAnderson

Pro

JacobAnderson forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by GWL-CPA 2 years ago
GWL-CPA
another retarded topic.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Dan4reason 2 years ago
Dan4reason
VS4EVAJacobAndersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con never posted arguments like he should and Pro rightly pointed out that he should.
Vote Placed by Defro 2 years ago
Defro
VS4EVAJacobAndersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: A debate is a debate, regardless of whether or not it is official or not. Pro could have easily won this debate, yet he refused to even post an argument. All he needed was one point to win. Pro claimed that "there is not point" to defend his case and negate Con's. There certainly is. The "point" is to win! Pro has wasted Con's time. Though Con is clearly not an "official debater", he was seriously trying to debate, therefore Pro has wasted Con's time. Conduct goes to Con.