The Instigator
TheCreationist
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
IceHawk2009
Con (against)
Winning
28 Points

chocolate is bad

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
IceHawk2009
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/1/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 721 times Debate No: 48124
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (5)

 

TheCreationist

Pro

it kills dogs
IceHawk2009

Con

Yes chocolate may kill dogs but does that make chocolate bad? I say no. There are many health benefits from eating chocolate. Chocolate has antioxidants, stearic acid which lowers cholesterol, and may reduce the risk of having a MI (heart attack)

http://www.webmd.com...
Debate Round No. 1
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by CJKAllstar 3 years ago
CJKAllstar
I'm very temped to see if I can win this with minimal amount of effort possible. Hm...should I accept? No that would be harsh.
Posted by liberal17 3 years ago
liberal17
You should be arrested!!!!! Just kidding!
Posted by Kytax 3 years ago
Kytax
-_- srsly???
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by TheGamer1998 3 years ago
TheGamer1998
TheCreationistIceHawk2009Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: There are chemicals in chocolate, in fact, Dark Chocolate may not taste the best but it is good for the heart
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
TheCreationistIceHawk2009Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments are made only by Con with sources.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
TheCreationistIceHawk2009Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con used logic, a source, and i'll give him conduct as well (since pro likely made this debate so that he can vote).
Vote Placed by The_Scapegoat_bleats 3 years ago
The_Scapegoat_bleats
TheCreationistIceHawk2009Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con clearly used the better arguments, refuted Pro's argument. No points for source because this one source was used a little too unspecifically. Grammar clearly goes to Con for using complete sentences.
Vote Placed by Actionsspeak 3 years ago
Actionsspeak
TheCreationistIceHawk2009Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con used logic, a source, and i'll give him conduct as well (since pro likely made this debate so that he can vote).