The Instigator
mental
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
JordanCJKM
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

compromise with nature for a better future

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/21/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 223 times Debate No: 70449
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

mental

Con

how cannot you compromise with nature.Nature has to be used for the coming generations .
JordanCJKM

Pro

Thank you opening up this debate.

I can see you are a tree hugger. So am I, and almost every living thing with feelings love nature.

Indeed we have to compromise with nature since that is where we live around with. But sometimes we have to arrange and interpret the priority. Often we take up land to construct buildings, but at the same time, we often take care of the nature around us. If we don't, there wouldn't be parks and or forests left anymore.

I totally agree on your statement, but we also have to interpret the priority of our living environment. If we put nature at the very first priority and everything under it, then I'm sure we will not have warm houses that we are living in right now.

Thank you for reading my words.
Debate Round No. 1
mental

Con

mental forfeited this round.
JordanCJKM

Pro

JordanCJKM forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
mental

Con

mental forfeited this round.
JordanCJKM

Pro

JordanCJKM forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.