The Instigator
adhithya
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Mutineer
Pro (for)
Winning
32 Points

computer games is better or outdoor games

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
Mutineer
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/3/2013 Category: Sports
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,117 times Debate No: 29825
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (7)

 

adhithya

Con

outdoor games is best because it keeps our body fit
Mutineer

Pro

I was requested to join this by the instigator himself.

I would like to point out that the round are only five minutes so I can barely post anything.

I believe that computer games are better because they allow for nearly limitless laws of physics, biology and chemistry to take place int he artificial land.

Many successful games such as Runescape, Call of Duty and Halo series are proof that it really can succeed when done to top notch quality.

Outdoor games do not seem to have any high quality aspect to them of any nature whatsoever.
Debate Round No. 1
adhithya

Con

we can't play in nature we can't get the fresh air and when we play computer games it will get fat only
Mutineer

Pro

Well this is true but the game itself allows for more to occur and nearly limitless realms of one's imagination to become reality.

Nature is just as boring as day-to-day life you are bound by gravity, assigned the subjective role you always play, no imagination, no thrill of killing imaginary enemies or facing computer generated obstacles and overall... No fun.


Fun is what a game is for after all.
Debate Round No. 2
adhithya

Con

What is the use of that is it makes real can you go to military or others can you do what you did in computer
Mutineer

Pro

Computer related fields of study are hugely demanded because so few geniuses wish to pass a computing master's degree.

The military is already overflowing in most nations.

As for games such a race-car driving and simulation flights, these actually can be astonishingly accurate to real-life scenarios (if you use a steering wheel or pilot's controller, along with pedals or perhaps other switches instead of standard console one) whereby you will be able to do those jobs.


I do agree that the military games like CoD and Modern Warfare are far from reality because the controller you use is hardly like a gun.

Also there is a far huger industry in computer games than outdoor ones.
Debate Round No. 3
adhithya

Con

we have to play in outdoors now a days the old person also plays the shuttle say if you like to play computer or outdoors
Mutineer

Pro

I have nothing to rebut because no valid point was made.

"we have to canplay in outdoors now a days the old person also plays the shuttle say if you like to play computer or outdoors
Debate Round No. 4
adhithya

Con

do you like outdoor or computer So the computer game is better that's all OK bye
Mutineer

Pro

My opponent has conceded.

"So the computer game is better"
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by likespeace 4 years ago
likespeace
adhithyaMutineerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con conceded. His one point was that outdoor games are good for fitness. In five minutes, Pro countered that computer games can help you learn for school or career and are more imaginative and fun. Spelling and grammar also to Pro for obvious reasons.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 4 years ago
vmpire321
adhithyaMutineerTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: 123
Vote Placed by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
adhithyaMutineerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I cant even figure out what the con was even trying to argue, his arguments were painfully short and unstructured while con's were well structured. Im also pretty sure con dropped every argument so im treatign this debate like it was a forfeit
Vote Placed by Deadlykris 4 years ago
Deadlykris
adhithyaMutineerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Wat
Vote Placed by morgan2252 4 years ago
morgan2252
adhithyaMutineerTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to pro because con concedes at the end. Spelling and grammar to pro because con has poor spelling and grammar. And, overall, I'd have to say that pro has better structured arguments, too.
Vote Placed by The_Master_Riddler 4 years ago
The_Master_Riddler
adhithyaMutineerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Bad conduct to make this debate 5 min long Bad spelling bye con' Lacks good arguments
Vote Placed by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
adhithyaMutineerTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Terribly structured arguments by Con, (Sorry dude) But if you are going to take a debate, at least make a decent argument, at most I could barely make out your objections and rebuttals. I was with you to begin with but was forced to switch sides.