The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)


Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
squonk has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/25/2016 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 484 times Debate No: 94068
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)





turhortan. a shmiggily mog!

maybe vi_spex can figure this one out


I accept the debate. I will begin my rebuttals in Round 1. Welcome vi_spex number 2, thanks for coming :)


My opponent has the full burden of proof in this debate. My opponent has to show how confusion equals to see. I do not need to provide arguments, I only need to rebut my opponent's case. I don't need to many any constructive case.


My opponent says "confusion=focus" This is a bare assertion, as my opponent does not use any definitons or sources to back up his claim.

The definition of confusion is, "a situation in which people are uncertain about what to do or are unable to understand something clearly [1]" The definiton of focus is, " a center of activity, attraction, or attention [2]." When you are not able to understand anything, or is uncertain, then you are not focused. Therefore I have refuted his claim, and shown that confusion is not the same as focus.

Focus can be manifold, but my opponent does not show how it can be manifold, it is a bare assertion, and he did not prove/ or give any thing how this gives an impact to the resolution. My opponent must prove this to fullfill his/her burden, and because he/she didn't do it, Vote for Con.

My opponent says that destiny is confusion. This is false, and my opponent gives an bare assertion. Destiny can change, and is unpredictable, but that does not mean it is confusion. My opponent also doesn't prove how this does an impact to the resolution.

My opponent then says that see is ponhot. In Merriam Webster, a very good dictionary, there is no such word [3]. See is therefore not this. My opponent doesn't prove see is ponhot, and does not say why this gives an impact to the resolution.

This sentence, "turhortan. a shmiggily mog!", does not make any sense, and does not give any impact on how see is confusion. Hence, vote for Con.

My opponent gives bare assertions, no impacts, and bad arguments, which don't even make sense. Therefore, vote for Con.





Vote Con.

Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by ThinkBig 2 years ago
vi_spex for the win!
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.