The Instigator
iswarsankha
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
baus
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points

corruption in india

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
baus
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/23/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 757 times Debate No: 55289
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

iswarsankha

Con

india face a lot of corruption both directly and indirectly
baus

Pro

My opponent concedes that corruption in India exists.

I, Pro, support this existence and hope that ht corruption goes on for as long as possible because corruption is the most beautiful thing on Earth.

Incorruptible countries have less spicy curries and their people too pale-skinned to naturally withstand the beautiful radiation of the sun.

Corruption is therefore linked to genetic superiority. Death to white people!
Debate Round No. 1
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by baus 2 years ago
baus
ok thank you
Posted by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
Baus, I didn't give you argument points because, I think con originally intended to take the position as you, and that he made it clear. Had you not both taken the con position, you would have won arguments. I'm sure most people will disagree with me and award you this win anyway. Good luck.
Posted by numberwang 2 years ago
numberwang
What kind of debate is this? It makes no sense!
Posted by NNEye 2 years ago
NNEye
Fifteen minutes and ten thousand characters?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Cobo 2 years ago
Cobo
iswarsankhabausTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Man...this was bad. Both had horrible grammar, yet I have to give it to pro due to them actually making a argument...no matter how horrible it was.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
iswarsankhabausTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:11 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had worse spelling and pro loses conduct for saying death to white people.