The Instigator
bunnyhero3335
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Reaper
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

debates???

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/2/2011 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,618 times Debate No: 15767
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

bunnyhero3335

Pro

is the point of a debate to win or lose is it for knowledge or joy???answer that plus thank you for your time...
Reaper

Con

I find that the point of debating varies from person to person, personally, I find it to be for knowledge and enjoyment rather than winning. The victory is merely a bonus.
Debate Round No. 1
bunnyhero3335

Pro

bunnyhero3335 forfeited this round.
Reaper

Con

Reaper forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
bunnyhero3335

Pro

bunnyhero3335 forfeited this round.
Reaper

Con

Well this was simple! ;) Quickest 'debate' I have ever had :P
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by phantom 6 years ago
phantom
That wasn't even a debate
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
bunnyhero3335ReaperTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: FF