do any violent games make humans violent in real life?
Debate Rounds (5)
violence, especially with teens, has gone down 91.1%, just as violent video games have sky-rocketed.kids who play violent games are less likely to be bullied or be a bully.100 percent people who murder/commit violence drink water. Does water make people more violent? NO! was violence the reason for the Sandy Hook School Shooting? NOPE. He had mental issues and shot his mother, lots of kids and teachers, and himself., I blame it on the mom for having a gun in the reach of a mentally ill person in that way.some mental ill people can handle guns,others can't. I have some mental illnesses and I can handle guns just fine.
research from http://videogames.procon.org... state that "Violent juvenile crime in the United States has been declining as violent video game popularity has increased. The arrest rate for juvenile murders has fallen 71.9% between 1995 and 2008. The arrest rate for all juvenile violent crimes has declined 49.3%. In this same period, video game sales have more than quadrupled."
A causal link between violent video games and violent behavior has not been proved. Many studies suffer from design flaws and use unreliable measures of violence and aggression such as noise blast tests. Thoughts about aggression have been confused with aggressive behavior, and there is a lack of studies that follow children over long periods of time.
A 2004 US Secret Service reviewof previous school-based attacks found that one-eighth of attackers exhibited an interest in violent video games, less than the rate of interest attackers showed in violent movies, books, and violence in their own writings. The report did not find a relationship between playing violent video games and school shootings.
Playing violent video games reduces violence in adolescent boys and girls by serving as a substitute for many violent acts. Playing violent video games allows adolescent boys and girls to express aggression and establish status in the peer group without causing physical harm.
Video game players understand they are playing a game. Their ability to distinguish between fantasy and reality prevents them from emulating video game violence in real life.
if you look over the studies of how violent video games make people act, it almost always comes out saying violent games do not make people violent.being a big gamer myself of violent games, i am not violent at all and i am 14, many say that the ages of 12-18 are more prone to being violent which is not the case. most murderers drink water, does that mean water makes people a murderer, NO! it is also shown that most murderers played violent games like GTA, COD, or halo, that does not mean it made them violent. they probable had some mental problem. and a research shows that homicides decrease in the following months of releases of M-rated games.
One case would be whom is known by the name of Zachary Burgess (his full story can be found here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com... , but I'll only be posting a little, than the copy and paste my opponent has presented.) In this story Zachary Burgress was walking in a bar parking lot. He took a stole a truck, forcibly held a woman against her will (though, she seemed unharmed and managed to escape), and on top of that rammed cars. Only to as he put it, apparently in Zachary's own words. "he wanted to see what it was to be a Grand Theft Auto individual, what it was like." That in itself is an act of violence, but on top of that a lot of other problems, just because of Grand Theft Auto. Now I will delve into a more...deadly story.
Here we look at the story of, Devin Moore. Seems like a typical here we see another story of the game. "Grand Theft Auto" but also child abuse lead him on a murder spree. After attempting to steal a car, (a decision or rather a reenactment later to be found out from the game GTA) got taken to police headquarters. Now, you might think the basic book him, and be done right? Wrong! He took out two cops, killed a dispatcher, and stole a cop car. Now this man managed to allude law enforcement for a long time, take note, he was armed and dangerous. Well one day some cop recognized him. You would think he just gave up? Wrong again. Devin pulled over, and shot at the cops multiple times, until he ran out of ammunition. To which he got down on his knees yelling at the cops to "Shoot me!" (Cops in GTA are known to just shoot you dead, or knock you down with a baton upon arresting you) That was what he thought would happen, and as he was taken he said a very disturbing statement. "Life is like a video games; we all have to die sometime." Now here is where you think "Oh, he couldn't tell the difference between reality, etc" Wrong! Devin Moore even admitted what he did was wrong, and he knew it was. But, he did it anyway. Ref: http://murderpedia.org... http://www.tuscaloosanews.com... http://www.people.com...
I will give my opponent time to think on these. I'd have put more but my character space is no longer allowing me I have run out.
darkhawkfrost forfeited this round.
The reason I have not been posting is because I have been caught up in my school work.
In fact. I am one who has played violent since I was 8 and I am a non-violent girl. sure, I can get angered easily but is not because of the games I play. The anger I get has been in my blood for many years. I am a perfectly normal non-violent girl who has never thought of abuse of violence to others. I do think of violence to myself many of times but never towards anyone else besides myself.
it is all in stereotyping the games. people think that just because a game gets a M rate then they think that it is bad. however, this is not the case. sure the game is very violent but the percent of people who become subjected to the violence is 2% of all that play the game.
all in all, just because a game is violent does not mean anyone(child or adult) will be violent after playing the game.
Now taking a look at your argument I know nothing about you. So, you may be right, it could just be in your blood. But, we do not know if games have influenced your anger, or what games you've played. Such is gamer rage (which I don't nearly understand.) As myself have never gotten violent due to a game as well. (Albeit I'm a very passive person) But, we aren't here to talk about us, saying that only two percent of people who play a specific game get violent is foolishness. We do not know how much get affected. But, you in yourself just admitted video games make people violent. Making all your arguments to this point practically null.
As to your last statement, is that really the case? Perhaps, for a few people, but even a child shot his grandmother: http://www.cnn.com... IF we look at this story, apparently he had just got done playing a 'video game' before doing this. Did this influence him? Possibly. Because, not many eight year olds surely just get up, grab a gun, and decide to shoot someone randomly without some sort of influence.
This whole point, you have offered nothing concrete in your arguments. Only stating that it's impossible, then contradicting yourself by saying people do indeed can be lead to violence from video games. Now video games can't make anyone do anything. It can't shove a gun, into someones hands, and force them to kill someone. But, it can be the reason why, reenactments, fun, unable to tell reality from fantasy. If you see these points, they all lead to video games in one way, or another.
Ratings on a game do not mean anything, any video game could make someone violent. We know that video games influence people into violence, or sometimes are the sole reason, to get more time to play, etc. But, we do not know what goes through that persons head. Thus, you cannot rightfully say that only 2% of a games player base makes them violent. Which is why, you have not seen me say so, and so percent of gamers are violent due to video games.
darkhawkfrost forfeited this round.
darkhawkfrost forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||6|
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.